From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm: mark a intentional data race in page_zonenum()
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:50:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480a7dde-f678-c07b-2231-4da8e0a38753@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206035235.2537-1-cai@lca.pw>
On 2/5/20 7:52 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> The commit 07d802699528 ("mm: devmap: refactor 1-based refcounting for
> ZONE_DEVICE pages") introduced a data race as page->flags could be
Hi,
I really don't think so. This "race" was there long before that commit.
Anyway, more below:
> accessed concurrently as noticied by KCSAN,
>
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in page_cpupid_xchg_last / put_page
>
> write (marked) to 0xfffffc0d48ec1a00 of 8 bytes by task 91442 on cpu 3:
> page_cpupid_xchg_last+0x51/0x80
> page_cpupid_xchg_last at mm/mmzone.c:109 (discriminator 11)
> wp_page_reuse+0x3e/0xc0
> wp_page_reuse at mm/memory.c:2453
> do_wp_page+0x472/0x7b0
> do_wp_page at mm/memory.c:2798
> __handle_mm_fault+0xcb0/0xd00
> handle_pte_fault at mm/memory.c:4049
> (inlined by) __handle_mm_fault at mm/memory.c:4163
> handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0
> handle_mm_fault at mm/memory.c:4200
> do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9
> do_user_addr_fault at arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1465
> (inlined by) do_page_fault at arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1539
> page_fault+0x34/0x40
>
> read to 0xfffffc0d48ec1a00 of 8 bytes by task 94817 on cpu 69:
> put_page+0x15a/0x1f0
> page_zonenum at include/linux/mm.h:923
> (inlined by) is_zone_device_page at include/linux/mm.h:929
> (inlined by) page_is_devmap_managed at include/linux/mm.h:948
> (inlined by) put_page at include/linux/mm.h:1023
> wp_page_copy+0x571/0x930
> wp_page_copy at mm/memory.c:2615
> do_wp_page+0x107/0x7b0
> __handle_mm_fault+0xcb0/0xd00
> handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0
> do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9
> page_fault+0x34/0x40
>
> Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
> CPU: 69 PID: 94817 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G W O L 5.5.0-next-20200204+ #6
> Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
>
> Both the read and write are done only with the non-exclusive mmap_sem
> held. Since the read only check for a specific bit in the flag, even if
Perhaps a clearer explanation is that the read of the page flags is always
looking at a bit range (zone number: up to 3 bits) that is not being written to by
the writer.
> load tearing happens, it will be harmless, so just mark it as an
> intentional data races using the data_race() macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 52269e56c514..cafccad584c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ vm_fault_t finish_mkwrite_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf);
>
> static inline enum zone_type page_zonenum(const struct page *page)
> {
> - return (page->flags >> ZONES_PGSHIFT) & ZONES_MASK;
> + return data_race((page->flags >> ZONES_PGSHIFT) & ZONES_MASK);
I don't know about this. Lots of the kernel is written to do this sort
of thing, and adding a load of "data_race()" everywhere is...well, I'm not
sure if it's really the best way. I wonder: could we maybe teach this
kcsan thing to understand a few of the key idioms, particularly about page
flags, instead of annotating all over the place?
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 3:52 Qian Cai
2020-02-06 4:50 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2020-02-06 9:04 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-06 11:14 ` Qian Cai
2020-02-06 14:01 ` Qian Cai
2020-02-06 14:35 ` Marco Elver
2020-02-06 23:18 ` John Hubbard
2020-02-07 13:18 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480a7dde-f678-c07b-2231-4da8e0a38753@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox