linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kasan: detect false-positives in tests
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:24:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48079c52cc329fbc52f4386996598d58022fb872.1617207873.git.andreyknvl@google.com> (raw)

Currently, KASAN-KUnit tests can check that a particular annotated part
of code causes a KASAN report. However, they do not check that no unwanted
reports happen between the annotated parts.

This patch implements these checks.

It is done by setting report_data.report_found to false in
kasan_test_init() and at the end of KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() and then
checking that it remains false at the beginning of
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() and in kasan_test_exit().

kunit_add_named_resource() call is moved to kasan_test_init(), and the
value of fail_data.report_expected is kept as false in between
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() annotations for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
---
 lib/test_kasan.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
index d77c45edc7cd..bf9225002a7e 100644
--- a/lib/test_kasan.c
+++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ static int kasan_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 
 	multishot = kasan_save_enable_multi_shot();
 	kasan_set_tagging_report_once(false);
+	fail_data.report_found = false;
+	fail_data.report_expected = false;
+	kunit_add_named_resource(test, NULL, NULL, &resource,
+					"kasan_data", &fail_data);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -61,6 +65,7 @@ static void kasan_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	kasan_set_tagging_report_once(true);
 	kasan_restore_multi_shot(multishot);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, fail_data.report_found);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -78,28 +83,30 @@ static void kasan_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
  * fields, it can reorder or optimize away the accesses to those fields.
  * Use READ/WRITE_ONCE() for the accesses and compiler barriers around the
  * expression to prevent that.
+ *
+ * In between KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL checks, fail_data.report_found is kept as
+ * false. This allows detecting KASAN reports that happen outside of the checks
+ * by asserting !fail_data.report_found at the start of KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL
+ * and in kasan_test_exit.
  */
-#define KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, expression) do {		\
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS))			\
-		migrate_disable();				\
-	WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected, true);		\
-	WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_found, false);		\
-	kunit_add_named_resource(test,				\
-				NULL,				\
-				NULL,				\
-				&resource,			\
-				"kasan_data", &fail_data);	\
-	barrier();						\
-	expression;						\
-	barrier();						\
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,					\
-			READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected),	\
-			READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found));	\
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)) {			\
-		if (READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found))		\
-			kasan_enable_tagging();			\
-		migrate_enable();				\
-	}							\
+#define KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, expression) do {			\
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS))				\
+		migrate_disable();					\
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found));	\
+	WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected, true);			\
+	barrier();							\
+	expression;							\
+	barrier();							\
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,						\
+			READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected),		\
+			READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found));		\
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)) {				\
+		if (READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found))			\
+			kasan_enable_tagging();				\
+		migrate_enable();					\
+	}								\
+	WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_found, false);			\
+	WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected, false);			\
 } while (0)
 
 #define KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, config) do {			\
-- 
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog



             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31 16:24 Andrey Konovalov [this message]
2021-03-31 16:58 ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48079c52cc329fbc52f4386996598d58022fb872.1617207873.git.andreyknvl@google.com \
    --to=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox