From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:16:32 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix spurious OOM kills Message-ID: <480430000.1100456191@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20041114170339.GB13733@dualathlon.random> References: <20041111112922.GA15948@logos.cnet> <4193E056.6070100@tebibyte.org> <4194EA45.90800@tebibyte.org> <20041113233740.GA4121@x30.random> <20041114094417.GC29267@logos.cnet> <20041114170339.GB13733@dualathlon.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Chris Ross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Martin MOKREJ? , tglx@linutronix.de List-ID: > My patch compared to yours will only save .text/.data/.bss bloat (i.e. > the opposite of what Martin was worried about) to avoid message passing > via global variable w/o locks from task context to kswapd. Heh, I wasn't really worried about the code size at all ... I was just pointing out that 1 page was a trivial amount to be worried about, in terms of when we start reclaim. M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org