linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: Make hugetlb mappings go through mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47de87e4-47df-4024-a313-03cc14b8e248@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqpgdBk-3Bcl3Mvr@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 06:04:04PM GMT, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 04:19:09PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > Yeah this is at commit aee8efc95fc2 ("mm: make hugetlb mappings go through
> > mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags").
> >
> > If you:
> >
> > git checkout aee8efc95fc2
> > git grep hugetlb_get_unmapped_area
> >
> > You'll see it.
> >
> > I'm guessing you remove this in future commits, but the kernel must be able
> > to build at every revision so we can bisect (I found this issue through a
> > bisect and had to fix this up to check).
> >
> > A trivial fix is just to provide the prototype immediately prior to the
> > function decl, however the more correct solution is probably to do the
> > removals at the same time.
>
> Yeah, I just squashed the removal commit and this one.
>
> > This bit is just a bit of a slightly nitty cleanup to make sure things
> > build at every commit, the first issue is the really key one, just needs
> > some tweaking to deal with the frankly bloody horrible SHM stuff... Do not
> > blame you for missing that one!
>
> I did not check closely yet, but are blowing up in:
>
>  if (shmem_huge != SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE) {
>          ...
> 	 if (file) {
> 		 VM_BUG_ON(file->f_op != &shmem_file_operations)
>
>  ?

I've not got the vm debug on in my build, so it's blowing up here for me:

static unsigned long shm_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file,
	unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff,
	unsigned long flags)
{
	struct shm_file_data *sfd = shm_file_data(file);

	return sfd->file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(sfd->file, addr, len,
						pgoff, flags);
}

Notice that that doesn't check whether sfd->file->f_op->get_unmapped_area
is NULL.

So since you remove this from the f_ops, it causes a NULL pointer deref.

In __get_unmapped_area() you have:

	if (file) {
		if (file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
			get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;

...

	if (get_area) {
		addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);

Now since you are dealing with a shm file that has shm_file_operations

static const struct file_operations shm_file_operations = {
..
	.get_unmapped_area	= shm_get_unmapped_area,
...
};

Then this get_area() is invoked, which calls shm_get_unmapped_area(), which
calls f_op->get_unmapped_area() on your hugetlbfs_file_operations object
which you just deleted and it's NULL.

This is why you have to be super careful here, there's clearly stuff out
there that assumes that this can't happen, which you need to track down.

A quick grep however _suggests_ this might be the one landmine place. But
you need to find a smart way to deal with this.

>
>
> --
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-31 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-29  9:10 [PATCH v2 0/9] Unify hugetlb into arch_get_unmapped_area functions Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm/mmap: Teach generic_get_unmapped_area{_topdown} to handle hugetlb mappings Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] arch/s390: Teach arch_get_unmapped_area{_topdown} " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] arch/x86: Teach arch_get_unmapped_area_vmflags " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] arch/sparc: Teach arch_get_unmapped_area{_topdown} " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arch/powerpc: Teach book3s64 " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: Make hugetlb mappings go through mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 11:02   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-31 15:08     ` Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 15:11       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 20:03         ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-31 15:19       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-31 16:04         ` Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 16:15           ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2024-08-01  8:14             ` Oscar Salvador
2024-08-01 10:11               ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-08-05 21:03   ` kernel test robot
2024-08-11 13:23   ` kernel test robot
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: Drop hugetlb_get_unmapped_area{_*} functions Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] arch/s390: Clean up hugetlb definitions Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: Consolidate common checks in hugetlb_mmap_check_and_align Oscar Salvador
2024-07-30  9:59   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47de87e4-47df-4024-a313-03cc14b8e248@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox