From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Make the memory controller more desktop responsive
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:14:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F4A700.3080307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080403184351.42de4f56.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:02:53 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> This patch makes the memory controller more responsive on my desktop.
>>
>> Here is what the patch does
>>
>> 1. Reduces the number of retries to 2. We had 5 earlier, since we
>> were controlling swap cache as well. We pushed data from mappings
>> to swap cache and we needed additional passes to clear out the cache.
>
> Hmm, what this change improves ?
> I don't want to see OOM.
>
I had set it to 5 earlier, since the swap cache came back to our memory
controller, where it was accounted. I have not seen OOM with it on my desktop,
but at some point if the memory required is so much that we cannot fulfill it,
we do OOM. I have not seen any OOM so far with these changes.
>> 2. It sets all cached pages as inactive. We were by default marking
>> all pages as active, thus forcing us to go through two passes for
>> reclaiming pages
> Agreed.
>
>> 3. Removes congestion_wait(), since we already have that logic in
>> do_try_to_free_pages()
>>
> Agreed.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-03 9:32 Balbir Singh
2008-04-03 9:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-03 9:44 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-04-03 9:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F4A700.3080307@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox