linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v4)
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:02:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F45DD9.4030004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830804022110h2090f3efg7c6173df8185679e@mail.gmail.com>

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>  I checked to see that cgroup_exit is called after mm_update_new_owner(). We call
>>  mm_update_new_owner() from exit_mm(). I did not check for current->cgroups !=
>>  new_owner->cgroups, since I did not want to limit the callbacks.
> 
> No cgroup subsystem should be concerned about mm ownership changes
> between tasks in the same cgroup. So I think that's a valid and useful
> optimization.
> 

Hmm. probably.. I'll do that check. Let me post v5 with these changes

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

      reply	other threads:[~2008-04-03  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-01 12:43 Balbir Singh
2008-04-01 16:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-01 16:15   ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-02  0:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-02  3:25   ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-02  4:53     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-02  6:40       ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-02 19:27     ` Paul Menage
2008-04-02 18:53 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-02 19:53   ` Paul Menage
2008-04-03  4:05     ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-03  4:10       ` Paul Menage
2008-04-03  4:32         ` Balbir Singh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47F45DD9.4030004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox