linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v2)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:24:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47ECEA8F.5060505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47ECE662.3060506@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Balbir Singh wrote:
> Paul Menage wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>  diff -puN include/linux/mm_types.h~memory-controller-add-mm-owner include/linux/mm_types.h
>>>  --- linux-2.6.25-rc5/include/linux/mm_types.h~memory-controller-add-mm-owner    2008-03-28 09:30:47.000000000 +0530
>>>  +++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/include/linux/mm_types.h    2008-03-28 12:26:59.000000000 +0530
>>>  @@ -227,8 +227,10 @@ struct mm_struct {
>>>         /* aio bits */
>>>         rwlock_t                ioctx_list_lock;
>>>         struct kioctx           *ioctx_list;
>>>  -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
>>>  -       struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
>>>  +#ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER
>>>  +       spinlock_t owner_lock;
>>>  +       struct task_struct *owner;      /* The thread group leader that */
>>>  +                                       /* owns the mm_struct.          */
>>>   #endif
>> I'm not convinced that we need the spinlock. Just use the simple rule
>> that you can only modify mm->owner if:
>>
>> - mm->owner points to current
>> - the new owner is a user of mm
> 
> This will always hold, otherwise it cannot be the new owner :)
> 
>> - you hold task_lock() for the new owner (which is necessary anyway to
>> ensure that the new owner's mm doesn't change while you're updating
>> mm->owner)
>>

Thinking more, I don't think it makes sense for us to overload task_lock() to do
the mm->owner handling (we don't want to mix lock domains). task_lock() is used
for several things

1. We don't want to make task_lock() rules more complicated by having it protect
an mm member to save space
2. We don't want more contention on task_lock()

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-28 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-28  8:23 Balbir Singh
2008-03-28  9:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-03-28  9:43   ` Jiri Slaby
2008-03-28 10:11     ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 10:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-28 10:51   ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 11:06     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-28 10:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-28 10:52   ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 11:04     ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 11:15     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-28 11:21       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-28 11:01 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 12:36   ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 12:54     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-03-28 14:06       ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 14:05     ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 14:52       ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 15:38         ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 18:10           ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 18:52             ` Paul Menage
2008-03-29  1:02               ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-29  5:46               ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47ECEA8F.5060505@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox