From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xemul@openvz.org, "hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: freeing page_cgroup at suitable chance
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:10:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47DDE130.4040509@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080314192253.edb38762.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> This patch is for freeing page_cgroup if a chunk of pages are freed.
>
> How this works
> * when the order of free page reaches PCGRP_SHRINK_ORDER, pcgrp is freed.
> This will be done by RCU.
>
> I think this works well because
> - unnecessary freeing will not occur in busy servers.
> - page_cgroup will be removed at necessary point (allocating Hugepage,etc..)
> - If tons of pages are freed (ex. big file is removed), page_cgroup will
> be removed.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsuc.com>
>
>
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 15 +++++++++++-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct page_cgroup_cache
> #define PCGRP_SHIFT (CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE_CGROUP_ORDER)
> #define PCGRP_SIZE (1 << PCGRP_SHIFT)
>
> +#if PCGRP_SHIFT + 3 >= MAX_ORDER
> +#define PCGRP_SHRINK_ORDER (MAX_ORDER - 1)
> +#else
> +#define PCGRP_SHRINK_ORDER (PCGRP_SHIFT + 3)
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Lookup and return page_cgroup struct.
> * returns NULL when
> @@ -70,12 +76,19 @@ get_page_cgroup(struct page *page, gfp_t
> return (ret)? ret : __get_page_cgroup(page, gfpmask, allocate);
> }
>
> +void try_to_shrink_page_cgroup(struct page *page, int order);
> +
extern void
> #else
>
> -static struct page_cgroup *
> +static inline struct page_cgroup *
> get_page_cgroup(struct page *page, gfp_t gfpmask, bool allocate)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +static inline void try_to_shrink_page_cgroup(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + return;
> +}
> +#define PCGRP_SHRINK_ORDER (MAX_ORDER)
> #endif
> #endif
> Index: mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/page_cgroup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/mmzone.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/radix-tree.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> @@ -80,6 +81,7 @@ static void save_result(struct page_cgro
> pcp = &__get_cpu_var(pcpu_page_cgroup_cache);
> pcp->ents[hash].idx = idx;
> pcp->ents[hash].base = base;
> + smp_wmb();
Whenever you add a memory barrier, you should comment on it.
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> @@ -156,6 +158,58 @@ out:
> return pc;
> }
>
> +/* Must be called under zone->lock */
> +void try_to_shrink_page_cgroup(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + int nid = page_to_nid(page);
> + int idx = pfn >> PCGRP_SHIFT;
> + int hnum = (PAGE_CGROUP_NR_CACHE - 1);
> + struct page_cgroup_cache *pcp;
> + struct page_cgroup_head *head;
> + struct page_cgroup_root *root;
> + unsigned long end_pfn;
> + int cpu;
> +
> +
redundant empty line
> + root = root_dir[nid];
> + if (!root || in_interrupt() || (order < PCGRP_SHIFT))
> + return;
> +
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + end_pfn = pfn + (1 << order);
> +
> + while (pfn != end_pfn) {
> + idx = pfn >> PCGRP_SHIFT;
> + /* Is this pfn has entry ? */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + head = radix_tree_lookup(&root->root_node, idx);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (!head) {
> + pfn += (1 << PCGRP_SHIFT);
pfn += PCGRP_SIZE;
> + continue;
> + }
> + /* It's guaranteed that no one access to this pfn/idx
> + because there is no reference to this page. */
> + hnum = (idx) & (PAGE_CGROUP_NR_CACHE - 1);
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + pcp = &per_cpu(pcpu_page_cgroup_cache, cpu);
> + smp_rmb();
> + if (pcp->ents[hnum].idx == idx)
> + pcp->ents[hnum].base = NULL;
> + }
> + if (spin_trylock(&root->tree_lock)) {
> + /* radix tree is freed by RCU. so they will not call
> + free_pages() right now.*/
> + radix_tree_delete(&root->root_node, idx);
> + spin_unlock(&root->tree_lock);
> + /* We can free this in lazy fashion .*/
> + free_page_cgroup(head);
> + }
> + pfn += (1 << PCGRP_SHIFT);
ditto
> + }
> +}
> +
> __init int page_cgroup_init(void)
> {
> int nid;
> Index: mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include <linux/fault-inject.h>
> #include <linux/page-isolation.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
> @@ -463,6 +464,8 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struc
> order++;
> }
> set_page_order(page, order);
> + if (order >= PCGRP_SHRINK_ORDER)
> + try_to_shrink_page_cgroup(page, order);
> list_add(&page->lru,
> &zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
> zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
>
> --
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-17 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 9:59 [PATCH 0/7] memcg: radix-tree page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] re-define page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-16 14:15 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-18 1:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 0:21 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:07 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] charge/uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 1:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-18 1:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:26 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: move_lists KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 2:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg: page migration KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:36 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 18:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 2:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:17 ` [PATCH 5/7] radix-tree page cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:56 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-17 3:26 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 1:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 2:05 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 2:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 3:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 3:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 4:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-20 5:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg: speed up by percpu KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 3:03 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 23:55 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-19 2:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 21:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-19 21:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 9:08 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-20 4:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: freeing page_cgroup at suitable chance KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 3:10 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-03-18 1:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 21:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 5:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-20 7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 14:49 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-03-20 16:04 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-03-20 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 16:15 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-03-15 6:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] memcg: radix-tree page_cgroup Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47DDE130.4040509@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox