Re: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller in Kconfig

[Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>]

> 1. We could create something similar to mem_map, we would need to handle 4

4? At least x86 mainline only has two ways now. flatmem and vmemmap.

> different ways of creating mem_map.

Well it would be only a single way to create the "aux memory controller
map" (or however it will be called). Basically just a call to single
function from a few different places.

> 2. On x86 with 64 GB ram, 

First i386 with 64GB just doesn't work, at least not with default 3:1
split. Just calculate it yourself how much of the lowmem area is left
after the 64GB mem_map is allocated. Typical rule of thumb is that 16GB
is the realistic limit for 32bit x86 kernels. Worrying about
anything more does not make much sense.

> if we decided to use vmalloc space, we would need 64
> MB of vmalloc'ed memory

Yes and if you increase mem_map you need exactly the same space
in lowmem too. So increasing the vmalloc reservation for this is
equivalent. Just make sure you use highmem backed vmalloc.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>