From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:53:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47840D00.8000907@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080108221646.GC21482@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt
>>> apply the s390/etc. bits), right?
>> Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that
>> covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think
>> Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now
>> conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm.
>
> well we cannot really ack it for x86 inclusion without having tested it
> through, so it will stay in x86.git for some time. That approach found a
> few problems with v1 already. In any case, v3 is looking pretty good so
> far - and it's cool stuff - i'm all for unifying/generalizing arch code.
>
> Ingo
Hi Ingo,
You probably will want to pick up V4 though I didn't add that ifndef
patch you mentioned earlier. There are no functional changes, basically
only a rebasing on the correct mm version.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-08 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 2:11 travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] percpu: Use a kconfig variable to signal arch specific percpu setup travis
2008-01-08 19:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] percpu: Move arch XX_PER_CPU_XX definitions into linux/percpu.h travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] percpu: Make the asm-generic/percpu.h more "generic" travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86_32: Use generic percpu.h travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86_64: Use generic percpu travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] s390: " travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] Powerpc: Use generic per cpu travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] Sparc64: Use generic percpu travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] ia64: " travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h travis
2008-01-08 9:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3 Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 16:27 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-08 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 22:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:53 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-01-08 19:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-08 20:29 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47840D00.8000907@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox