linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:35:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476DC76E7D1DF2438D32BFADF679FC560125F3A8@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160726202926.GC11776@node.shutemov.name>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On
> Behalf Of Kirill A. Shutemov
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 1:29 PM
> To: Roberts, William C <william.c.roberts@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:57:45PM +0000, Roberts, William C wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kirill A. Shutemov [mailto:kirill@shutemov.name]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:26 PM
> > > To: Roberts, William C <william.c.roberts@intel.com>
> > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:27:11AM -0700, william.c.roberts@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > This patch introduces the ability randomize mmap locations where
> > > > the address is not requested, for instance when ld is allocating
> > > > pages for shared libraries. It chooses to randomize based on the
> > > > current personality for ASLR.
> > > >
> > > > Currently, allocations are done sequentially within unmapped
> > > > address space gaps. This may happen top down or bottom up depending on
> scheme.
> > > >
> > > > For instance these mmap calls produce contiguous mappings:
> > > > int size = getpagesize();
> > > > mmap(NULL, size, flags, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
> > > 0x40026000
> > > > mmap(NULL, size, flags, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
> > > 0x40027000
> > > >
> > > > Note no gap between.
> > > >
> > > > After patches:
> > > > int size = getpagesize();
> > > > mmap(NULL, size, flags, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
> > > 0x400b4000
> > > > mmap(NULL, size, flags, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
> > > 0x40055000
> > > >
> > > > Note gap between.
> > >
> > > And why is it good?
> >
> > Currently if you get an info leak and discover, say the address to
> > libX It's just a matter of adding/subtracting a fixed offset to find
> > libY. This will make rop a bit harder if you're trying to rop into a
> > different library than what was leaked.
> >
> > This also has a benefit outside of just libraries in that it
> > randomizes all the Mappings done via mmap from run to run. So you
> > don't get consistent, known offsets to things within the memory space.
> >
> > >
> > > > Using the test program mentioned here, that allocates fixed sized
> > > > blocks till exhaustion:
> > > > https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2011-05/msg00252.ht
> > > > ml, no difference was noticed in the number of allocations. Most
> > > > varied from run to run, but were always within a few allocations
> > > > of one another between patched and un-patched runs.
> > > >
> > > > Performance Measurements:
> > > > Using strace with -T option and filtering for mmap on the program
> > > > ls shows a slowdown of approximate 3.7%
> > >
> > > NAK.
> > >
> > > It's just too costly. And no obvious benefits.
> >
> > Sorry I used to have the explanation in the message, a carless edit
> > removed it.
> >
> > The cost does suck, perhaps something like personality + KConfig option....
> 
> Cost sucks even more than you've mentioned: you'll pay on every page fault, as
> find_vma() would have more vmas in the tree and vmacache will not be that
> effective. That's something people spend a lot time to tune.

Yes that is very true. Perhaps randomizing in some other manner is more
Prudent, yet another mmap() flag?

> 
> Taking this into account, I can't see any real-world application that would opt-in
> for this security feature.

Dynamic linker?

> 
> --
>  Kirill A. Shutemov
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to
> majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-26 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-26 18:27 william.c.roberts
2016-07-26 19:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-07-26 19:57   ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:29     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-07-26 20:35       ` Roberts, William C [this message]
     [not found] <1469557346-5534-1-git-send-email-william.c.roberts@intel.com>
     [not found] ` <1469557346-5534-2-git-send-email-william.c.roberts@intel.com>
     [not found]   ` <20160726200309.GJ4541@io.lakedaemon.net>
2016-07-26 20:13     ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:59       ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 21:06         ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 21:44           ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 23:51             ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-02 17:17             ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-03 18:19               ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:15           ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-27 16:59         ` Nick Kralevich
2016-07-28 21:07           ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-02 16:57           ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:02             ` Nick Kralevich
2016-08-14 16:31           ` Pavel Machek 1
     [not found]   ` <CAFJ0LnENnrpVA_SdngGxeShsmxq9Mvc0h9EH1=8vEP=hFFnt1g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <476DC76E7D1DF2438D32BFADF679FC5601260044@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
2016-07-26 21:11       ` Nick Kralevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476DC76E7D1DF2438D32BFADF679FC560125F3A8@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox