linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>
To: Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@oracle.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	Matteo.Carlini@arm.com,  Valentin.Schneider@arm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,  dave.kleikamp@oracle.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk,  robin.murphy@arm.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com,  yang@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:59:53 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47461daf-3aa5-493f-7278-b0116ee2c724@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116210633.116278-1-eric.mackay@oracle.com>

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Eric Mackay wrote:

>
> It seems > 256 was chosen as the cutoff simply because it preserves existing behavior.
> The patch description seems to imply there was pushback from distro maintainers on just increasing
> the default NR_CPUS.

Yup that was it.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-17 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-15  0:05 Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-15 15:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-16  7:10   ` Kefeng Wang
2024-01-16  9:28     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-16 13:08   ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-16 21:06     ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-17 19:59       ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere) [this message]
2024-01-15 23:59 ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-16 11:24   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-16 21:06     ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-17 20:01       ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-18 17:53         ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-23 23:55           ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Lameter (Ampere)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47461daf-3aa5-493f-7278-b0116ee2c724@linux.com \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Matteo.Carlini@arm.com \
    --cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
    --cc=eric.mackay@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox