From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"containers@lists.osdl.org" <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [5/6] memory cgroup and migration fix
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:56:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470BAB9A.30203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071009185459.49663a71.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> While using memory control cgroup, page-migration under it works as following.
> ==
> 1. uncharge all refs at try to unmap.
> 2. charge regs again remove_migration_ptes()
> ==
> This is simple but has following problems.
> ==
> The page is uncharged and chaged back again if *mapped*.
> - This means that cgroup before migraion can be different from one after
> migraion
> - If page is not mapped but charged as page cache, charge is just ignored
> (because not mapped, it will not be uncharged before migration)
> This is memory leak.
> ==
> This patch tries to keep memory cgroup at page migration by increasing
> one refcnt during it. 3 functions are added.
>
> mem_cgroup_prepare_migration() --- increase refcnt of page->page_cgroup
> mem_cgroup_end_migration() --- decrease refcnt of page->page_cgroup
> mem_cgroup_page_migration() --- copy page->page_cgroup from old page to
> new page.
>
> During migration
> - old page is under PG_locked.
> - new page is under PG_locked, too.
> - both old page and new page are not on LRU.
>
> These 3 facts guarantees page_cgroup() migration has no race, I think.
>
> Tested and worked well in x86_64/fake-NUMA box.
>
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
> - reflected comments.
> - divided a patche to !PageLRU patch and migration patch.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/migrate.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2/mm/migrate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2.orig/mm/migrate.c
> +++ devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -598,9 +598,10 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct page
> else
> rc = fallback_migrate_page(mapping, newpage, page);
>
> - if (!rc)
> + if (!rc) {
> + mem_cgroup_page_migration(page, newpage);
> remove_migration_ptes(page, newpage);
> - else
> + } else
> newpage->mapping = NULL;
>
> unlock_page(newpage);
> @@ -619,6 +620,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
> int *result = NULL;
> struct page *newpage = get_new_page(page, private, &result);
> int rcu_locked = 0;
> + int charge = 0;
>
> if (!newpage)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -660,14 +662,20 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
> */
> if (!page->mapping)
> goto rcu_unlock;
> +
> + charge = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page);
> /* Establish migration ptes or remove ptes */
> try_to_unmap(page, 1);
>
> if (!page_mapped(page))
> rc = move_to_new_page(newpage, page);
>
> - if (rc)
> + if (rc) {
> remove_migration_ptes(page, page);
> + if (charge)
> + mem_cgroup_end_migration(page);
> + } else if (charge)
> + mem_cgroup_end_migration(newpage);
> rcu_unlock:
> if (rcu_locked)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> Index: devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_p
> mem_cgroup_uncharge(page_get_page_cgroup(page));
> }
>
> +extern int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page);
> +extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
> +extern void mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT */
> static inline void mm_init_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -107,6 +111,21 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *mm_cgro
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
> +{
> +}
> +
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
> Index: devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ devel-2.6.23-rc8-mm2/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,49 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page_cgr
> }
> }
> }
> +/*
> + * Returns non-zero if a page (under migration) has valid page_cgroup member.
> + * Refcnt of page_cgroup is incremented.
> + */
> +
> +int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + int ret = 0;
> + lock_page_cgroup(page);
> + pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
> + if (pc && atomic_inc_not_zero(&pc->ref_cnt))
> + ret = 1;
> + unlock_page_cgroup(page);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup *pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
> + mem_cgroup_uncharge(pc);
> +}
> +/*
> + * We know both *page* and *newpage* are now not-on-LRU and Pg_locked.
> + * And no rece with uncharge() routines becasue page_cgroup for *page*
> + * has extra one reference by mem_cgroup_prepare_migration.
> + */
> +
> +void mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> +retry:
> + pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
> + if (!pc)
> + return;
> + if (clear_page_cgroup(page, pc) != pc)
> + goto retry;
> + pc->page = newpage;
> + lock_page_cgroup(newpage);
> + page_assign_page_cgroup(newpage, pc);
> + unlock_page_cgroup(newpage);
> + return;
> +}
>
> int mem_cgroup_write_strategy(char *buf, unsigned long long *tmp)
> {
>
Looks good to me
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-09 9:46 [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [0/6] intro KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 9:49 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [1/6] fix refcnt race in charge/uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 10:38 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-09 22:31 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-10-10 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 9:50 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [2/6] fix err handling in charging KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 10:48 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-09 9:51 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [3/6] add helper function for page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 11:09 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-09 11:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-10 0:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 9:53 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [4/6] avoid handling !LRU page in mem_cgroup_isolate_pages KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 15:35 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-09 9:54 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [5/6] memory cgroup and migration fix KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 16:26 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-10-09 9:55 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [6/6] add force reclaim interface KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 18:44 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-10 0:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-09 10:30 ` [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [0/6] intro Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470BAB9A.30203@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox