From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:34:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46bc7aa3-4b08-4e5f-9563-485ee17e2785@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55c6c1f6-0792-61c3-86ed-4729d4a3fdf5@google.com>
Hi,
On 2023/12/13 08:10, David Rientjes wrote:
> On 6.6 I measured "hugepagesz=1G hugepages=11776" on as 12TB host to be
> 77s this time around.
Thanks for your test! Is this the total kernel boot time, or just the
hugetlb initialization time?
>
> A latest Linus build with this patch set does not boot successfully, so
Which branch/tag is it compiled on?
I test this patch on v6.7-rc4 and next-20231130.
> I'll need to look into that and try to capture the failure. Not sure if
> it's related to this patch or the latest Linus build in general.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-18 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 2:52 Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] padata: dispatch works on different nodes Gang Li
2023-12-12 23:40 ` Tim Chen
2023-12-18 6:46 ` Gang Li
2023-12-27 10:33 ` Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and initialization Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] hugetlb: add timing to hugetlb allocations on boot Gang Li
2023-12-12 20:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init " Mike Kravetz
2023-12-21 7:22 ` Gang Li
2023-12-12 22:14 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-12 23:08 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-12-13 0:10 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-18 6:34 ` Gang Li [this message]
2023-12-22 4:33 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-25 5:21 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-25 6:24 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46bc7aa3-4b08-4e5f-9563-485ee17e2785@bytedance.com \
--to=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gang.li@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox