RE: [PATCH v18 02/19] EDAC: Add scrub control feature

[Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
[...]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 02/19] EDAC: Add scrub control feature
>
>On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 07:34:41PM +0000, Shiju Jose wrote:
>> My understanding is that you meant the following changes (diff to this
>> patch), for scrub?  (and similar for other features).  Please let me
>> know if you need any corrections.
>
>Yes, something like that except "select" is evil and should be used only when the
>items it selects do not pull in more stuff. And since scrub is all optional, it should
>all be depends.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Kconfig b/drivers/edac/Kconfig index
>> 06f7b43a6f78..709bd7ad8015 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> @@ -9,6 +9,14 @@ config EDAC_ATOMIC_SCRUB  config EDAC_SUPPORT
>>  	bool
>>
>> +config EDAC_FEAT_SCRUB
>
>EDAC_SCRUB is perfectly fine.
>
>> +	bool
>> +	help
>> +	  The EDAC scrub feature is optional and is designed to control the
>> +	  memory scrubbers in the system. The common sysfs scrub interface
>> +	  abstracts the control of various arbitrary scrubbing functionalities
>> +	  into a unified set of functions.
>
>This should come...
>
>> +
>>  menuconfig EDAC
>>  	tristate "EDAC (Error Detection And Correction) reporting"
>>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM && EDAC_SUPPORT && RAS
>
>... in here as it is part of EDAC.
>
>Thx.
>
Hi Boris,

I  have incorporated your suggestions for the next version.  
However before sending next version, I am wondering are you planning for further review on
this v18 series and giving any other feedbacks?     

Thanks,
Shiju