linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:43:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E171AF.8060502@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709070828.05730.ak@suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, travis@sgi.com wrote:
>> Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map,
>> whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access
>> function has been defined.
>>
>> In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and ppc64 arch's to
>> move the cpu_sibling_map from a static cpumask_t array [NR_CPUS] to
>> be per_cpu cpumask_t arrays.
>>
>> Note that I do not have the ability to build or test patch 3/3, the
>> ppc64 changes.
>>
>> Patches are referenced against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 .
> 
> It would be better if you could redo the patches with the original patches
> reverted, not incremental changes. In the end we'll need a full patch set
> with full changelog anyways, not a series of incremental fixes.

Will do.  Thanks.

I take it I should run a diff against rc4 (w/o mm1) to regenerate a
complete patch, including the prior ones?

> 
> Also I guess some powerpc testers would be needed. Perhaps cc the
> maintainers?

I've been looking for where to Cc: those guys (as Andrew probably realizes
from his extra "spam" from me. ;-)

Thanks!
Mike

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-07 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-07  4:09 travis
2007-09-07  4:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] core: Provide an arch independent means of accessing cpu_sibling_map travis
2007-09-07  4:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] ia64: Convert cpu_sibling_map to a per_cpu data array travis
2007-09-07  4:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] ppc64: " travis
2007-09-07 11:18   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2007-09-07 12:59     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2007-09-07 15:36       ` Mike Travis
2007-09-07  7:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures Andi Kleen
2007-09-07 10:56   ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-07 15:47     ` Mike Travis
2007-09-07 15:43   ` Mike Travis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46E171AF.8060502@sgi.com \
    --to=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox