From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ak@suse.de, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 3/3 - get_mempolicy.2
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:30:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D2B5C7.2090001@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187799145.5166.18.camel@localhost>
Applied for man-pages-2.65.
Thanks Lee!
Cheers,
Michael
Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 3/3 - get_mempolicy.2
>
> Against: man pages 2.64
>
> Changes:
>
> + changed the "policy" parameter to "mode" through out the
> descriptions in an attempt to promote the concept that the memory
> policy is a tuple consisting of a mode and optional set of nodes.
>
> + added requirement to link '-lnuma' to synopsis
>
> + rewrite portions of description for clarification.
>
> + added all errors currently returned by sys call.
>
> + removed cautionary note that use of MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR
> is not supported. This is no longer true.
>
> + added mmap(2) to See Also list.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
>
> Index: Linux/man2/get_mempolicy.2
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/man2/get_mempolicy.2 2007-06-22 14:25:23.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/man2/get_mempolicy.2 2007-08-10 12:33:23.000000000 -0400
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> .\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
> .\"
> .\" 2006-02-03, mtk, substantial wording changes and other improvements
> +.\" 2007-06-01, lts, more precise specification of behavior.
> .\"
> .TH GET_MEMPOLICY 2 2006-02-07 "Linux" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> .SH NAME
> @@ -26,9 +27,11 @@ get_mempolicy \- Retrieve NUMA memory po
> .B "#include <numaif.h>"
> .nf
> .sp
> -.BI "int get_mempolicy(int *" policy ", unsigned long *" nodemask ,
> +.BI "int get_mempolicy(int *" mode ", unsigned long *" nodemask ,
> .BI " unsigned long " maxnode ", unsigned long " addr ,
> .BI " unsigned long " flags );
> +.sp
> +.BI "cc ... \-lnuma"
> .fi
> .\" FIXME rewrite this DESCRIPTION. it is confusing.
> .SH DESCRIPTION
> @@ -39,7 +42,7 @@ depending on the setting of
>
> A NUMA machine has different
> memory controllers with different distances to specific CPUs.
> -The memory policy defines in which node memory is allocated for
> +The memory policy defines from which node memory is allocated for
> the process.
>
> If
> @@ -58,58 +61,75 @@ then information is returned about the p
> address given in
> .IR addr .
> This policy may be different from the process's default policy if
> -.BR set_mempolicy (2)
> -has been used to establish a policy for the page containing
> +.BR mbind (2)
> +or one of the helper functions described in
> +.BR numa(3)
> +has been used to establish a policy for the memory range containing
> .IR addr .
>
> -If
> -.I policy
> -is not NULL, then it is used to return the policy.
> +If the
> +.I mode
> +argument is not NULL, then
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will store the policy mode of the requested NUMA policy in the location
> +pointed to by this argument.
> If
> .IR nodemask
> -is not NULL, then it is used to return the nodemask associated
> -with the policy.
> +is not NULL, then the nodemask associated with the policy will be stored
> +in the location pointed to by this argument.
> .I maxnode
> -is the maximum bit number plus one that can be stored into
> -.IR nodemask .
> -The bit number is always rounded to a multiple of
> -.IR "unsigned long" .
> -.\"
> -.\" If
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specifies both
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_NODE
> -.\" and
> -.\" .BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> -.\" then
> -.\" .I policy
> -.\" instead returns the number of the node on which the address
> -.\" .I addr
> -.\" is allocated.
> -.\"
> -.\" If
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specifies
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_NODE
> -.\" but not
> -.\" .BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> -.\" and the process's current policy is
> -.\" .BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
> -.\" then
> -.\" checkme: Andi's text below says that the info is returned in
> -.\" 'nodemask', not 'policy':
> -.\" .I policy
> -.\" instead returns the number of the next node that will be used for
> -.\" interleaving allocation.
> -.\" FIXME .
> -.\" The other valid flag is
> -.\" .I MPOL_F_NODE.
> -.\" It is only valid when the policy is
> -.\" .I MPOL_INTERLEAVE.
> -.\" In this case not the interleave mask, but an unsigned long with the next
> -.\" node that would be used for interleaving is returned in
> -.\" .I nodemask.
> -.\" Other flag values are reserved.
> +specifies the number of node ids
> +that can be stored into
> +.IR nodemask \(emthat
> +is, the maximum node id plus one.
> +The value specified by
> +.I maxnode
> +is always rounded to a multiple of
> +.IR "sizeof(unsigned long)" .
> +
> +If
> +.I flags
> +specifies both
> +.B MPOL_F_NODE
> +and
> +.BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will return the node id of the node on which the address
> +.I addr
> +is allocated into the location pointed to by
> +.IR mode .
> +If no page has yet been allocated for the specified address,
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will allocate a page as if the process had performed a read
> +[load] access to that address, and return the id of the node
> +where that page was allocated.
> +
> +If
> +.I flags
> +specifies
> +.BR MPOL_F_NODE ,
> +but not
> +.BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> +and the process's current policy is
> +.BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
> +then
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will return in the location pointed to by a non-NULL
> +.I mode
> +argument,
> +the node id of the next node that will be used for
> +interleaving of internal kernel pages allocated on behalf of the process.
> +.\" Note: code returns next interleave node via 'mode' argument -lts
> +These allocations include pages for memory mapped files in
> +process memory ranges mapped using the
> +.IR mmap (2)
> +call with the
> +.I MAP_PRIVATE
> +flag for read accesses, and in memory ranges mapped with the
> +.I MAP_SHARED
> +flag for all accesses.
> +
> +Other flag values are reserved.
>
> For an overview of the possible policies see
> .BR set_mempolicy (2).
> @@ -120,49 +140,84 @@ returns 0;
> on error, \-1 is returned and
> .I errno
> is set to indicate the error.
> -.\" .SH ERRORS
> -.\" FIXME -- no errors are listed on this page
> -.\" .
> -.\" .TP
> -.\" .B EINVAL
> -.\" .I nodemask
> -.\" is non-NULL, and
> -.\" .I maxnode
> -.\" is too small;
> -.\" or
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specified values other than
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_NODE
> -.\" or
> -.\" .BR MPOL_F_ADDR ;
> -.\" or
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specified
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_ADDR
> -.\" and
> -.\" .I addr
> -.\" is NULL.
> -.\" (And there are other
> -.\" .B EINVAL
> -.\" cases.)
> -.SH CONFORMING TO
> -This system call is Linux specific.
> +.SH ERRORS
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +The value specified by
> +.I maxnode
> +is less than the number of node ids supported by the system.
> +Or
> +.I flags
> +specified values other than
> +.B MPOL_F_NODE
> +or
> +.BR MPOL_F_ADDR ;
> +or
> +.I flags
> +specified
> +.B MPOL_F_ADDR
> +and
> +.I addr
> +is NULL,
> +or
> +.I flags
> +did not specify
> +.B MPOL_F_ADDR
> +and
> +.I addr
> +is not NULL.
> +Or,
> +.I flags
> +specified
> +.B MPOL_F_NODE
> +but not
> +.B MPOL_F_ADDR
> +and the current process policy is not
> +.BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE .
> +(And there are other EINVAL cases.)
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +Part of all of the memory range specified by
> +.I nodemask
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +points outside your accessible address space.
> .SH NOTES
> -This manual page is incomplete:
> -it does not document the details the
> -.BR MPOL_F_NODE
> -flag,
> -which modifies the operation of
> -.BR get_mempolicy ().
> -This is deliberate: this flag is not intended for application use,
> -and its operation may change or it may be removed altogether in
> -future kernel versions.
> -.B Do not use it.
> +If the mode of the process policy or the policy governing allocations at the
> +specified address is
> +.I MPOL_PREFERRED
> +and this policy was installed with an empty
> +.IR nodemask \(emspecifying
> +local allocation,
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will return the mask of on-line node ids in the location pointed to by
> +a non-NULL
> +.I nodemask
> +argument.
> +This mask does not take into consideration any adminstratively imposed
> +restrictions on the process' context.
> +.\" FIXME:
> +.\" "context" above refers to cpusets. No man page to reference. --lts
> +
> +.\" Christoph says the following is untrue. These are "fully supported."
> +.\" Andi concedes that he has lost this battle and approves [?]
> +.\" updating the man pages to document the behavior. --lts
> +.\" This manual page is incomplete:
> +.\" it does not document the details the
> +.\" .BR MPOL_F_NODE
> +.\" flag,
> +.\" which modifies the operation of
> +.\" .BR get_mempolicy ().
> +.\" This is deliberate: this flag is not intended for application use,
> +.\" and its operation may change or it may be removed altogether in
> +.\" future kernel versions.
> +.\" .B Do not use it.
> .SS "Versions and Library Support"
> See
> .BR mbind (2).
> .SH SEE ALSO
> .BR mbind (2),
> +.BR mmap (2),
> .BR set_mempolicy (2),
> .BR numactl (8),
> .BR numa (3)
>
>
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-27 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-29 19:33 [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-29 20:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-29 20:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 16:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-30 17:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 8:20 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-05-31 14:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 15:56 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-06-01 21:15 ` [PATCH] enhance memory policy sys call man pages v1 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-23 6:11 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 6:32 ` mbind.2 man page patch Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 14:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 17:19 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-26 18:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 18:18 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 6:32 ` get_mempolicy.2 " Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-28 9:31 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-09 18:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-09 20:57 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-16 20:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-18 5:50 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-21 15:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-22 4:10 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:08 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 1/3 - mbind.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:29 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:10 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 2/3 - set_mempolicy.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:30 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:12 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 3/3 - get_mempolicy.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:30 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2007-08-27 10:46 ` get_mempolicy.2 man page patch Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 6:33 ` set_mempolicy.2 " Michael Kerrisk
2007-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-30 17:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 6:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 6:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 6:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 6:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 7:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 7:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 7:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 17:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 17:07 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 10:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 11:04 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 11:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 15:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 17:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 18:56 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 20:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 20:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 9:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 10:21 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 12:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 17:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 19:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 21:05 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 21:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 13:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-04 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 17:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-04 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 21:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-05 14:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 20:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 20:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 21:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 21:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-02 7:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 11:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 11:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 12:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 12:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 18:28 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 19:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 19:25 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-31 20:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-29 20:07 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 16:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D2B5C7.2090001@gmx.net \
--to=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox