From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46AE1B5F.8060705@krose.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:09:51 -0400 From: Kyle Rose MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu> <1185814234.16771.1.camel@lappy> In-Reply-To: <1185814234.16771.1.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > As for breaking binary crap, thats a bonus. Break them hard, break them > often. > I think there's a big difference in philosophy between "break binary drivers if you want to make a legitimate change for whatever reason" and "break binary drivers just to be a pain in the ass to the developers and users of said drivers." I think most people here agree with the first. It's unclear to me how many here agree with the second, but I know it's at least one. ;-) Kyle -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org