From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46AE18AE.50305@tigershaunt.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:22 -0400 From: Rashkae MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu> <1185814243.7377.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1185814243.7377.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: Matthew Hawkins , ck@vds.kolivas.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > Do we care ? The code should be replaced with ptep_get_and_clear + > pte_modify anyway.. > Since the general direction of this thread was for people to test 3D game performance with the shiny new CFS cpu scheduler, I would say yes, we do care if people with the only 2 types of gaming caliber Video cards can get said video cards working, right now, with said shiny new kernel. Yes yes, I know, kernel devs don't care if they break binary drivers... and in principle, I agree with that philosophy.. but it's still damn inconvenient at times :) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org