From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46A773EA.5030103@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:01:46 +0200 From: Rene Herman MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: howto get a patch merged (WAS: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) References: <367a23780707250830i20a04a60n690e8da5630d39a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <367a23780707250830i20a04a60n690e8da5630d39a9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Kacper Wysocki Cc: Ingo Molnar , david@lang.hm, Nick Piggin , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Ray Lee , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck list , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Jackson , Andrew Morton , Jesper Juhl List-ID: On 07/25/2007 05:30 PM, Kacper Wysocki wrote: >>> main question is _why_ the hell it helps updatedb. > Is that what [ ... ] And there we go again -- off into blabber-land. Why does swap-prefetch help updatedb? Or doesn't it? And if it doesn't, why should anyone trust anything else someone who said it does says? Rene. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org