linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
To: ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Subject: mbind.2 man page patch
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:32:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A44B8D.2040200@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1180732544.5278.158.camel@localhost>

Andi, Christoph

Could you please review these changes by Lee to the mbind.2 page?  Patch
against man-pages-2.63 (available from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages).

Andi / Christoph / Lee: There are a few points marked FIXME about which I'd
particularly like some input.

Lee: aside from the changes tha you made, plus my edits, I added a sentence
to this page that cam in independently from Samuel Thibau;t (marked below).

Cheers,

Michael

--- mbind.2.orig        2007-07-01 06:22:24.000000000 +0200
+++ mbind.2     2007-07-21 09:18:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 .\" Copyright 2003,2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
+.\" and Copyright (C) 2007 Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
 .\"
 .\" Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this
 .\" manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are
@@ -18,92 +19,214 @@
 .\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
 .\"
 .\" 2006-02-03, mtk, substantial wording changes and other improvements
+.\" 2007-06-01, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
+.\"     more precise specification of behavior.
 .\"
-.TH MBIND 2 2006-02-07 "Linux" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
+.TH MBIND 2 2007-07-20 Linux "Linux Programmer's Manual"
 .SH NAME
 mbind \- Set memory policy for a memory range
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
 .B "#include <numaif.h>"
 .sp
-.BI "int mbind(void *" start ", unsigned long " len  ", int " policy ,
+.BI "int mbind(void *" start ", unsigned long " len  ", int " mode ,
 .BI "          unsigned long *" nodemask  ", unsigned long " maxnode ,
 .BI "          unsigned " flags );
 .sp
-.BI "cc ... \-lnuma"
+Link with \fI\-lnuma\fP.
 .fi
 .SH DESCRIPTION
+The memory of a NUMA machine is divided into multiple nodes.
+The memory policy defines the node on which memory is allocated.
 .BR mbind ()
-sets the NUMA memory
-.I policy
+sets the NUMA memory policy
 for the memory range starting with
 .I start
 and continuing for
 .IR len
 bytes.
-The memory of a NUMA machine is divided into multiple nodes.
-The memory policy defines in which node memory is allocated.
+.\" The following sentence added by Samuel Thibault:
+.I start
+must be page aligned.
+
+The NUMA policy consists of a policy mode, specified in
+.IR mode ,
+and a set of zero or nodes, specified in
+.IR nodemask ;
+these arguments are described below.
+
+If the memory range specified by the
+.IR start " and " len
+arguments includes an anonymous region of memory (i.e.,
+a region of memory created using
+.BR mmap (2)
+with the
+.BR MAP_ANONYMOUS
+flag) or
+a memory mapped file mapped using
+.BR mmap (2)
+with the
+.B MAP_PRIVATE
+flag, pages will only be allocated according to the specified
+policy when the application writes [stores] to the page.
+For anonymous regions, an initial read access will use a shared
+page in the kernel containing all zeros.
+For a file mapped with
+.BR MAP_PRIVATE ,
+an initial read access will allocate pages according to the
+process policy of the process that causes the page to be allocated.
+This might not be the process that called
+.BR mbind ().
+
+If the specified memory range includes a memory mapped file mapped using
+.BR mmap (2)
+with the
+.B MAP_SHARED
+flag, the specified policy will be ignored for all page allocations
+in this range.
+.\" FIXME Lee / Andi: can you clarify/confirm "the specified policy
+.\" will be ignored for all page allocations in this range".
+.\" That text seems to be saying that if the memory range contains
+.\" (say) some mappings that are allocated with MAP_SHARED
+.\" and others allocated with MAP_PRIVATE, then the policy
+.\" will be ignored for all of the mappings, including even
+.\" the MAP_PRIVATE mappings.  Right?  I just want to be
+.\" sure that that is what the text is meaning.
+Instead, the pages will be allocated according to the process policy
+of the process that caused the page to be allocated.
+Again, this might not be the process that called
+.BR mbind ().
+
+If the specified memory range includes a shared memory region
+created using
+.BR shmget (2)
+and attached using
+.BR shmat (2),
+pages allocated for the anonymous or shared memory region will
+be allocated according to the policy specified, regardless of which
+process attached to the shared memory segment causes the allocation.
+If, however, the shared memory region was created with the
+.B SHM_HUGETLB
+flag,
+the huge pages will be allocated according to the policy specified
+only if the page allocation is caused by the task that calls
+.BR mbind ()
+for that region.
+
+By default,
 .BR mbind ()
 only has an effect for new allocations; if the pages inside
-the range have been already touched before setting the policy,
+the range have already been touched before setting the policy,
 then the policy has no effect.
+This default behavior may be overridden by the
+.BR MPOL_MF_MOVE
+and
+.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
+flags described below.

-Available policies are
+The
+.I mode
+argument must specify one of
 .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
 .BR MPOL_BIND ,
 .BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
-and
+or
 .BR MPOL_PREFERRED .
-All policies except
+All policy modes except
 .B MPOL_DEFAULT
-require the caller to specify the nodes to which the policy applies in the
+require the caller to specify
+the node or nodes to which the mode applies, via the
 .I nodemask
-parameter.
+argument.
+
 .I nodemask
-is a bit mask of nodes containing up to
+points to a bit mask of nodes containing up to
 .I maxnode
 bits.
-The actual number of bytes transferred via this argument
+The actual number of bytes transferred via
+.I nodemask
 is rounded up to the next multiple of
 .IR "sizeof(unsigned long)" ,
 but the kernel will only use bits up to
 .IR maxnode .
-A NULL argument means an empty set of nodes.
+A NULL value for
+.IR nodemask ,
+or a
+.I maxnode
+value of zero specifies the empty set of nodes.
+If the value of
+.I maxnode
+is zero, then the
+.I nodemask
+argument is ignored.

 The
 .B MPOL_DEFAULT
-policy is the default and means to use the underlying process policy
-(which can be modified with
-.BR set_mempolicy (2)).
-Unless the process policy has been changed this means to allocate
-memory on the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation.
+mode specifies the default policy.
+When applied to a range of memory via
+.BR mbind (),
+this means that the process policy should be used;
+the process policy can be set with
+.BR set_mempolicy (2).
+If the mode of the process policy is also
+.BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
+then pages will be allocated on the node of the CPU that
+triggers the allocation.
+For
+.BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
+the
 .I nodemask
-should be specified as NULL.
+and
+.I maxnode
+arguments must be specify the empty set of nodes.

 The
 .B MPOL_BIND
-policy is a strict policy that restricts memory allocation to the
-nodes specified in
+mode specifies a strict policy that restricts memory allocation to
+the nodes specified in
 .IR nodemask .
+If
+.I nodemask
+specifies more than one node, page allocations will come from
+the node with the lowest numeric node ID first, until that node
+contains no free memory.
+Allocations will then come from the node with the next highest
+node ID specified in
+.I nodemask
+and so forth, until none of the specified nodes contains free memory.
 There won't be allocations on other nodes.

+The
 .B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
-interleaves allocations to the nodes specified in
+mode specifies that page allocations be interleaved across the
+set of nodes specified in
 .IR nodemask .
-This optimizes for bandwidth instead of latency.
+This optimizes for bandwidth instead of latency
+by spreading out pages and memory accesses to those pages across
+multiple nodes.
 To be effective the memory area should be fairly large,
-at least 1MB or bigger.
+at least 1MB or bigger with a fairly uniform access pattern.
+Accesses to a single page of the area will still be limited to
+the memory bandwidth of a single node.

 .B MPOL_PREFERRED
 sets the preferred node for allocation.
-The kernel will try to allocate in this
+The kernel will try to allocate pages on this
 node first and fall back to other nodes if the
 preferred nodes is low on free memory.
-Only the first node in the
+If
+.I nodemask
+specifies more than one node ID, the first node in the
+mask will be selected as the preferred node.
+If the
 .I nodemask
-is used.
-If no node is set in the mask, then the memory is allocated on
-the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation allocation).
+and
+.I maxnode
+arguments specify the empty set, then the memory is allocated on
+the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation.
+This is the only way to specify "local allocation" for a
+range of memory via
+.BR mbind ().

 If
 .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
@@ -115,17 +238,20 @@
 .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
 then the call will fail with the error
 .B EIO
-if the existing pages in the mapping don't follow the policy.
-In 2.6.16 or later the kernel will also try to move pages
-to the requested node with this flag.
+if the existing pages in the memory range don't follow the policy.
+.\" FIXME Andi / Christoph -- can you please verify Lee's change here:
+.\" According to the kernel code, the following is not true
+.\" -- Lee Schermerhorn:
+.\" In 2.6.16 or later the kernel will also try to move pages
+.\" to the requested node with this flag.

 If
 .B MPOL_MF_MOVE
-is passed in
+is specified in
 .IR flags ,
-then an attempt will be made  to
-move all the pages in the mapping so that they follow the policy.
-Pages that are shared with other processes are not moved.
+then the kernel will attempt to move all the existing pages
+in the memory range so that they follow the policy.
+Pages that are shared with other processes will not be moved.
 If
 .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
 is also specified, then the call will fail with the error
@@ -136,8 +262,8 @@
 .B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
 is passed in
 .IR flags ,
-then all pages in the mapping will be moved regardless of whether
-other processes use the pages.
+then the kernel will attempt to move all existing pages in the memory
+range regardless of whether other processes use the pages.
 The calling process must be privileged
 .RB ( CAP_SYS_NICE )
 to use this flag.
@@ -154,10 +280,15 @@
 .I errno
 is set to indicate the error.
 .SH ERRORS
+.\"  I think I got all of the error returns.  -- Lee Schermerhorn
 .TP
 .B EFAULT
-There was a unmapped hole in the specified memory range
-or a passed pointer was not valid.
+Part or all of the memory range specified by
+.I nodemask
+and
+.I maxnode
+points outside your accessible address space.
+Or, there was a unmapped hole in the specified memory range.
 .TP
 .B EINVAL
 An invalid value was specified for
@@ -169,56 +300,96 @@
 was less than
 .IR start ;
 or
-.I policy
-was
+.I start
+is not a multiple of the system page size.
+Or,
+.I mode
+is
 .B MPOL_DEFAULT
 and
 .I nodemask
-pointed to a non-empty set;
+specified a non-empty set;
 or
-.I policy
-was
+.I mode
+is
 .B MPOL_BIND
 or
 .B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
 and
 .I nodemask
-pointed to an empty set,
+is empty.
+Or,
+.I maxnode
+specifies more than a page worth of bits.
+Or,
+.I nodemask
+specifies one or more node IDs that are
+greater than the maximum supported node ID,
+or are not allowed in the calling task's context.
+.\" "calling task's context" refers to cpusets.
+.\" No man page avail to reference. -- Lee Schermerhorn
+Or, none of the node IDs specified by
+.I nodemask
+are on-line, or none of the specified nodes contain memory.
 .TP
 .B ENOMEM
-System out of memory.
+Insufficient kernel memory was available.
 .TP
 .B EIO
 .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
 was specified and an existing page was already on a node
-that does not follow the policy.
+that does not follow the policy;
+or
+.B MPOL_MF_MOVE
+or
+.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
+was specified and the kernel was unable to move all existing
+pages in the range.
+.TP
+.B EPERM
+The
+.I flags
+argument included the
+.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
+flag and the caller does not have the
+.B CAP_SYS_NICE
+privilege.
 .SH CONFORMING TO
 This system call is Linux specific.
 .SH NOTES
-NUMA policy is not supported on file mappings.
+NUMA policy is not supported on a memory mapped file range
+that was mapped with the
+.B MAP_SHARED
+flag.

 .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
-is  ignored  on  huge page mappings right now.
+is ignored on huge page mappings.

-It is unfortunate that the same flag,
+The
 .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
-has different effects for
-.BR mbind (2)
+mode has different effects for
+.BR mbind ()
 and
 .BR set_mempolicy (2).
-To select "allocation on the node of the CPU that
-triggered the allocation" (like
-.BR set_mempolicy (2)
-.BR MPOL_DEFAULT )
-when calling
+When
+.B MPOL_DEFAULT
+is specified for a range of memory using
 .BR mbind (),
+any pages subsequently allocated for that range will use
+the process's policy, as set by
+.BR set_mempolicy (2).
+This effectively removes the explicit policy from the
+specified range.
+To select "local allocation" for a memory range,
 specify a
-.I policy
+.I mode
 of
 .B MPOL_PREFERRED
-with an empty
-.IR nodemask .
-.SS "Versions and Library Support"
+with an empty set of nodes.
+This method will work for
+.BR set_mempolicy (2),
+as well.
+.SS "Versions and LIbrary Support"
 The
 .BR mbind (),
 .BR get_mempolicy (2),
@@ -228,16 +399,17 @@
 They are only available on kernels compiled with
 .BR CONFIG_NUMA .

-Support for huge page policy was added with 2.6.16.
-For interleave policy to be effective on huge page mappings the
-policied memory needs to be tens of megabytes or larger.
-
-.B MPOL_MF_MOVE
-and
-.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
-are only available on Linux 2.6.16 and later.
+You can link with
+.I \-lnuma
+to get system call definitions.
+.I libnuma
+and the required
+.I numaif.h
+header are available in the
+.I numactl
+package.

-These system calls should not be used directly.
+However, applications should not use these system calls directly.
 Instead, the higher level interface provided by the
 .BR numa (3)
 functions in the
@@ -247,20 +419,25 @@
 .I numactl
 package is available at
 .IR ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/ak/numa/ .
-
-You can link with
-.I \-lnuma
-to get system call definitions.
-.I libnuma
-is available in the
-.I numactl
+The package is also included in some Linux distributions.
+Some distributions include the development library and header
+in the separate
+.I numactl-devel
 package.
-This package also has the
-.I numaif.h
-header.
+
+Support for huge page policy was added with 2.6.16.
+For interleave policy to be effective on huge page mappings the
+policied memory needs to be tens of megabytes or larger.
+
+.B MPOL_MF_MOVE
+and
+.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
+are only available on Linux 2.6.16 and later.
 .SH SEE ALSO
-.BR numa (3),
-.BR numactl (8),
-.BR set_mempolicy (2),
 .BR get_mempolicy (2),
-.BR mmap (2)
+.BR mmap (2),
+.BR set_mempolicy (2),
+.BR shmat (2),
+.BR shmget (2),
+.BR numa (3),
+.BR numactl (8)




--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-23  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-29 19:33 [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-29 20:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-29 20:16   ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 16:17     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-30 17:41       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31  8:20       ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-05-31 14:49         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 15:56           ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-06-01 21:15         ` [PATCH] enhance memory policy sys call man pages v1 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-23  6:11           ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23  6:32           ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2007-07-23 14:26             ` mbind.2 man page patch Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 17:19               ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-26 18:06                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 18:18                   ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23  6:32           ` get_mempolicy.2 " Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-28  9:31             ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-09 18:43               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-09 20:57                 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-16 20:05               ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-18  5:50                 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-21 15:45                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-22  4:10                     ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:08                       ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 1/3 - mbind.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:29                         ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:10                       ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 2/3 - set_mempolicy.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:30                         ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:12                       ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 3/3 - get_mempolicy.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:30                         ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-27 10:46                 ` get_mempolicy.2 man page patch Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23  6:33           ` set_mempolicy.2 " Michael Kerrisk
2007-05-30 16:55   ` [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-30 17:56     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31  6:18       ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31  6:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31  6:47           ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31  6:56             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31  7:11               ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31  7:24                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31  7:39                   ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 17:43                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 17:07                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 10:43             ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 11:04               ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 11:30                 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 15:26                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 17:41                     ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 18:56                       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 20:06                         ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 20:43                           ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01  9:38                             ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 10:21                               ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 12:25                                 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 13:09                                   ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 17:15                                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 18:43                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 19:38                                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 19:48                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 21:05                                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 21:56                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 13:46                                             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-04 16:34                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 17:02                                                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-04 17:11                                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 20:23                                                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 21:51                                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-05 14:30                                                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 20:28                                     ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 20:45                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 21:10                                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 21:58                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-02  7:23                                         ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 11:47                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 11:59                   ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 12:15                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 12:18                       ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 18:28       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 18:35         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 19:29           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 19:25       ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-31 20:22         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-29 20:07 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 16:04   ` Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46A44B8D.2040200@gmx.net \
    --to=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox