From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
clameter@sgi.com, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enhance memory policy sys call man pages v1
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:11:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A44699.3040105@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1180732544.5278.158.camel@localhost>
Lee, (and Andi, Christoph),
Sorry that I have not replied sooner.
The patches you have written look like a great piece of work. Thanks! I
have made some light edits to improve wording and grammar, and added a
small fix that came in independently from Samuel Thibault for mbind.2.
I have also rebased the patches to include a few small changes that have
occurred between man-pages-2.51 and man-pages-2.63. These changes are all
minor, and are formatting changes, reodering of a few sections, and similar.
Andi, Christoph: please see below.
Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> Subject was: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy
>
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:20 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>>>> The docs are wrong. This is fully supported.
>>>> Yes, I gave up on that one and the warning in the manpage should be
>>>> probably dropped
>>> OK. I'll work with the man page maintainers.
>> Hi Lee,
>>
>> If you could write a patch for the man page, that would be ideal.
>> Location of current tarball is in the .sig.
>
> [PATCH] enhance memory policy sys call man pages v1
>
> Against man pages 2.51
>
> This patch enhances the 3 memory policy system call man pages
> to add description of missing semantics, error return values,
> etc. The descriptions match the semantics of the kernel circa
> 2.6.21/22, as gleaned from the source code.
>
> I have changed the "policy" parameter to "mode" through out the
> descriptions in an attempt to promote the concept that the memory
> policy is a tuple consisting of a mode and optional set of nodes.
> Also matches internal name and <numaif.h> prototypes for mbind()
> and set_mempolicy().
>
> I think I've covered all of the existing errno returns, but may
> have missed a few.
>
> These pages definitely need proofing by other sets of eyes...
Andi, Christoph: I don't have enough understanding of these system calls to
technically review the changes that Lee has made. Can one or both of you
please help? I will forward the revised patches as three separate mails
following this one. (NOTE: ignore the patch below; it is now stale.)
Cheers,
Michael
> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
>
> man2/get_mempolicy.2 | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> man2/mbind.2 | 335 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> man2/set_mempolicy.2 | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 526 insertions(+), 204 deletions(-)
>
> Index: Linux/man2/mbind.2
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/man2/mbind.2 2007-05-11 19:07:02.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/man2/mbind.2 2007-06-01 12:28:06.000000000 -0400
> @@ -18,15 +18,16 @@
> .\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
> .\"
> .\" 2006-02-03, mtk, substantial wording changes and other improvements
> +.\" 2007-06-01, lts, more precise specification of behavior.
> .\"
> -.TH MBIND 2 "2006-02-07" "SuSE Labs" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> +.TH MBIND 2 "2007-06-01" "SuSE Labs" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> .SH NAME
> mbind \- Set memory policy for a memory range
> .SH SYNOPSIS
> .nf
> .B "#include <numaif.h>"
> .sp
> -.BI "int mbind(void *" start ", unsigned long " len ", int " policy ,
> +.BI "int mbind(void *" start ", unsigned long " len ", int " mode ,
> .BI " unsigned long *" nodemask ", unsigned long " maxnode ,
> .BI " unsigned " flags );
> .sp
> @@ -34,76 +35,179 @@ mbind \- Set memory policy for a memory
> .fi
> .SH DESCRIPTION
> .BR mbind ()
> -sets the NUMA memory
> -.I policy
> +sets the NUMA memory policy,
> +which consists of a policy mode and zero or more nodes,
> for the memory range starting with
> .I start
> and continuing for
> .IR len
> bytes.
> The memory of a NUMA machine is divided into multiple nodes.
> -The memory policy defines in which node memory is allocated.
> +The memory policy defines from which node memory is allocated.
> +
> +If the memory range specified by the
> +.IR start " and " len
> +arguments includes an "anonymous" region of memory\(emthat is
> +a region of memory created using the
> +.BR mmap (2)
> +system call with the
> +.BR MAP_ANONYMOUS \(emor
> +a memory mapped file, mapped using the
> +.BR mmap (2)
> +system call with the
> +.B MAP_PRIVATE
> +flag, pages will only be allocated according to the specified
> +policy when the application writes [stores] to the page.
> +For anonymous regions, an initial read access will use a shared
> +page in the kernel containing all zeros.
> +For a file mapped with
> +.BR MAP_PRIVATE ,
> +an initial read access will allocate pages according to the
> +process policy of the process that causes the page to be allocated.
> +This may not be the process that called
> +.BR mbind ().
> +
> +If the specified memory range includes a memory mapped file,
> +mapped using the
> +.BR mmap (2)
> +system call with the
> +.B MAP_SHARED
> +flag, the specified policy will be ignored for all page allocations
> +in this range.
> +Rather the pages will be allocated according to the process policy
> +of the process that caused the page to be allocated.
> +Again, this may not be the process that called
> +.BR mbind ().
> +
> +If the specified memory range includes a shared memory region
> +created using the
> +.BR shmget (2)
> +system call and attached using the
> +.BR shmat (2)
> +system call,
> +pages allocated for the anonymous or shared memory region will
> +be allocated according to the policy specified, regardless which
> +process attached to the shared memory segment causes the allocation.
> +If, however, the shared memory region was created with the
> +.B SHM_HUGETLB
> +flag,
> +the huge pages will be allocated according to the policy specified
> +only if the page allocation is caused by the task that calls
> +.BR mbind ()
> +for that region.
> +
> +By default,
> .BR mbind ()
> only has an effect for new allocations; if the pages inside
> the range have been already touched before setting the policy,
> then the policy has no effect.
> +This default behavior may be overridden by the
> +.BR MPOL_MF_MOVE
> +and
> +.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> +flags described below.
>
> -Available policies are
> +The
> +.I mode
> +argument must specify one of
> .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
> .BR MPOL_BIND ,
> -.BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
> -and
> +.B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> +or
> .BR MPOL_PREFERRED .
> -All policies except
> +All policy modes except
> .B MPOL_DEFAULT
> -require the caller to specify the nodes to which the policy applies in the
> +require the caller to specify via the
> .I nodemask
> -parameter.
> +parameter,
> +the node or nodes to which the mode applies.
> +
> .I nodemask
> -is a bitmask of nodes containing up to
> +points to a bitmask of nodes containing up to
> .I maxnode
> bits.
> -The actual number of bytes transferred via this argument
> -is rounded up to the next multiple of
> +The bit mask size is rounded to the next multiple of
> .IR "sizeof(unsigned long)" ,
> but the kernel will only use bits up to
> .IR maxnode .
> -A NULL argument means an empty set of nodes.
> +A NULL value of
> +.I nodemask
> +or a
> +.I maxnode
> +value of zero specifies the empty set of nodes.
> +If the value of
> +.I maxnode
> +is zero,
> +the
> +.I nodemask
> +argument is ignored.
>
> The
> .B MPOL_DEFAULT
> -policy is the default and means to use the underlying process policy
> -(which can be modified with
> -.BR set_mempolicy (2)).
> -Unless the process policy has been changed this means to allocate
> -memory on the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation.
> +mode specifies the default policy.
> +When applied to a range of memory via
> +.IR mbind (),
> +this means to use the process policy,
> + which may have been set with
> +.BR set_mempolicy (2).
> +If the mode of the process policy is also
> +.B MPOL_DEFAULT
> +pages will be allocated on the node of the CPU that triggers the allocation.
> +For
> +.BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
> +the
> .I nodemask
> -should be specified as NULL.
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +arguments must be specify the empty set of nodes.
>
> The
> .B MPOL_BIND
> -policy is a strict policy that restricts memory allocation to the
> -nodes specified in
> +mode specifies a strict policy that restricts memory allocation to
> +the nodes specified in
> .IR nodemask .
> +If
> +.I nodemask
> +specifies more than one node, page allocations will come from
> +the node with the lowest numeric node id first, until that node
> +contains no free memory.
> +Allocations will then come from the node with the next highest
> +node id specified in
> +.I nodemask
> +and so forth, until none of the specified nodes contain free memory.
> There won't be allocations on other nodes.
>
> +The
> .B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> -interleaves allocations to the nodes specified in
> +mode specifies that page allocations be interleaved across the
> +set of nodes specified in
> .IR nodemask .
> -This optimizes for bandwidth instead of latency.
> +This optimizes for bandwidth instead of latency
> +by spreading out pages and memory accesses to those pages across
> +multiple nodes.
> To be effective the memory area should be fairly large,
> -at least 1MB or bigger.
> +at least 1MB or bigger with a fairly uniform access pattern.
> +Accesses to a single page of the area will still be limited to
> +the memory bandwidth of a single node.
>
> .B MPOL_PREFERRED
> sets the preferred node for allocation.
> -The kernel will try to allocate in this
> +The kernel will try to allocate pages from this
> node first and fall back to other nodes if the
> preferred nodes is low on free memory.
> -Only the first node in the
> +If
> .I nodemask
> -is used.
> -If no node is set in the mask, then the memory is allocated on
> -the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation allocation).
> +specifies more than one node id, the first node in the
> +mask will be selected as the preferred node.
> +If the
> +.I nodemask
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +arguments specify the empty set, then the memory is allocated on
> +the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation.
> +This is the only way to specify "local allocation" for a
> +range of memory via
> +.IR mbind (2).
>
> If
> .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
> @@ -115,17 +219,18 @@ is not
> .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
> then the call will fail with the error
> .B EIO
> -if the existing pages in the mapping don't follow the policy.
> -In 2.6.16 or later the kernel will also try to move pages
> -to the requested node with this flag.
> +if the existing pages in the memory range don't follow the policy.
> +.\" According to the kernel code, the following is not true --lts
> +.\" In 2.6.16 or later the kernel will also try to move pages
> +.\" to the requested node with this flag.
>
> If
> .B MPOL_MF_MOVE
> -is passed in
> +is specified in
> .IR flags ,
> -then an attempt will be made to
> -move all the pages in the mapping so that they follow the policy.
> -Pages that are shared with other processes are not moved.
> +then the kernel will attempt to move all the existing pages
> +in the memory range so that they follow the policy.
> +Pages that are shared with other processes will not be moved.
> If
> .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
> is also specified, then the call will fail with the error
> @@ -136,8 +241,8 @@ If
> .B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> is passed in
> .IR flags ,
> -then all pages in the mapping will be moved regardless of whether
> -other processes use the pages.
> +then the kernel will attempt to move all existing pages in the memory range
> +regardless of whether other processes use the pages.
> The calling process must be privileged
> .RB ( CAP_SYS_NICE )
> to use this flag.
> @@ -146,6 +251,7 @@ If
> is also specified, then the call will fail with the error
> .B EIO
> if some pages could not be moved.
> +.\" ---------------------------------------------------------------
> .SH RETURN VALUE
> On success,
> .BR mbind ()
> @@ -153,11 +259,9 @@ returns 0;
> on error, \-1 is returned and
> .I errno
> is set to indicate the error.
> +.\" ---------------------------------------------------------------
> .SH ERRORS
> -.TP
> -.B EFAULT
> -There was a unmapped hole in the specified memory range
> -or a passed pointer was not valid.
> +.\" I think I got all of the error returns. --lts
> .TP
> .B EINVAL
> An invalid value was specified for
> @@ -169,53 +273,102 @@ or
> was less than
> .IR start ;
> or
> -.I policy
> -was
> -.B MPOL_DEFAULT
> +.I start
> +is not a multiple of the system page size.
> +Or,
> +.I mode
> +is
> +.I MPOL_DEFAULT
> and
> .I nodemask
> -pointed to a non-empty set;
> +specified a non-empty set;
> or
> -.I policy
> -was
> -.B MPOL_BIND
> +.I mode
> +is
> +.I MPOL_BIND
> or
> -.B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> +.I MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> and
> .I nodemask
> -pointed to an empty set,
> +is empty.
> +Or,
> +.I maxnode
> +specifies more than a page worth of bits.
> +Or,
> +.I nodemask
> +specifies one or more node ids that are
> +greater than the maximum supported node id,
> +or are not allowed in the calling task's context.
> +.\" "calling task's context" refers to cpusets. No man page avail to ref. --lts
> +Or, none of the node ids specified by
> +.I nodemask
> +are on-line, or none of the specified nodes contain memory.
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +Part of all of the memory range specified by
> +.I nodemask
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +points outside your accessible address space.
> +Or, there was a unmapped hole in the specified memory range.
> .TP
> .B ENOMEM
> -System out of memory.
> +Insufficient kernel memory was available.
> .TP
> .B EIO
> .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
> was specified and an existing page was already on a node
> -that does not follow the policy.
> +that does not follow the policy;
> +or
> +.B MPOL_MF_MOVE
> +or
> +.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> +was specified and the kernel was unable to move all existing
> +pages in the range.
> +.TP
> +.B EPERM
> +The
> +.I flags
> +argument included the
> +.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> +flag and the caller does not have the
> +.B CAP_SYS_NICE
> +privilege.
> +.\" ---------------------------------------------------------------
> .SH NOTES
> -NUMA policy is not supported on file mappings.
> +NUMA policy is not supported on a memory mapped file range
> +that was mapped with the
> +.I MAP_SHARED
> +flag.
>
> .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
> -is ignored on huge page mappings right now.
> +is ignored on huge page mappings.
>
> -It is unfortunate that the same flag,
> +The
> .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
> -has different effects for
> +mode has different effects for
> .BR mbind (2)
> and
> .BR set_mempolicy (2).
> -To select "allocation on the node of the CPU that
> -triggered the allocation" (like
> -.BR set_mempolicy (2)
> -.BR MPOL_DEFAULT )
> -when calling
> +When
> +.B MPOL_DEFAULT
> +is specified for a range of memory using
> .BR mbind (),
> +any pages subsequently allocated for that range will use
> +the process' policy, as set by
> +.BR set_mempolicy (2).
> +This effectively removes the explicit policy from the
> +specified range.
> +To select "local allocation" for a memory range,
> specify a
> -.I policy
> +.I mode
> of
> .B MPOL_PREFERRED
> -with an empty
> -.IR nodemask .
> +with an empty set of nodes.
> +This method will work for
> +.BR set_mempolicy (2),
> +as well.
> +.\" ---------------------------------------------------------------
> .SH "VERSIONS AND LIBRARY SUPPORT"
> The
> .BR mbind (),
> @@ -226,16 +379,18 @@ system calls were added to the Linux ker
> They are only available on kernels compiled with
> .BR CONFIG_NUMA .
>
> -Support for huge page policy was added with 2.6.16.
> -For interleave policy to be effective on huge page mappings the
> -policied memory needs to be tens of megabytes or larger.
> -
> -.B MPOL_MF_MOVE
> -and
> -.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> -are only available on Linux 2.6.16 and later.
> +You can link with
> +.I -lnuma
> +to get system call definitions.
> +.I libnuma
> +and the required
> +.I numaif.h
> +header.
> +are available in the
> +.I numactl
> +package.
>
> -These system calls should not be used directly.
> +However, applications should not use these system calls directly.
> Instead, the higher level interface provided by the
> .BR numa (3)
> functions in the
> @@ -245,17 +400,21 @@ The
> .I numactl
> package is available at
> .IR ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/ak/numa/ .
> -
> -You can link with
> -.I -lnuma
> -to get system call definitions.
> -.I libnuma
> -is available in the
> -.I numactl
> +The package is also included in some Linux distributions.
> +Some distributions include the development library and header
> +in the separate
> +.I numactl-devel
> package.
> -This package also has the
> -.I numaif.h
> -header.
> +
> +Support for huge page policy was added with 2.6.16.
> +For interleave policy to be effective on huge page mappings the
> +policied memory needs to be tens of megabytes or larger.
> +
> +.B MPOL_MF_MOVE
> +and
> +.B MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> +are only available on Linux 2.6.16 and later.
> +
> .SH CONFORMING TO
> This system call is Linux specific.
> .SH SEE ALSO
> @@ -263,4 +422,6 @@ This system call is Linux specific.
> .BR numactl (8),
> .BR set_mempolicy (2),
> .BR get_mempolicy (2),
> -.BR mmap (2)
> +.BR mmap (2),
> +.BR shmget (2),
> +.BR shmat (2).
> Index: Linux/man2/get_mempolicy.2
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/man2/get_mempolicy.2 2007-04-12 18:42:49.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/man2/get_mempolicy.2 2007-06-01 12:29:00.000000000 -0400
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> .\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
> .\"
> .\" 2006-02-03, mtk, substantial wording changes and other improvements
> +.\" 2007-06-01, lts, more precise specification of behavior.
> .\"
> .TH GET_MEMPOLICY 2 "2006-02-07" "SuSE Labs" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> .SH SYNOPSIS
> @@ -26,9 +27,11 @@ get_mempolicy \- Retrieve NUMA memory po
> .B "#include <numaif.h>"
> .nf
> .sp
> -.BI "int get_mempolicy(int *" policy ", unsigned long *" nodemask ,
> +.BI "int get_mempolicy(int *" mode ", unsigned long *" nodemask ,
> .BI " unsigned long " maxnode ", unsigned long " addr ,
> .BI " unsigned long " flags );
> +.sp
> +.BI "cc ... \-lnuma"
> .fi
> .\" TBD rewrite this. it is confusing.
> .SH DESCRIPTION
> @@ -39,7 +42,7 @@ depending on the setting of
>
> A NUMA machine has different
> memory controllers with different distances to specific CPUs.
> -The memory policy defines in which node memory is allocated for
> +The memory policy defines from which node memory is allocated for
> the process.
>
> If
> @@ -58,58 +61,75 @@ then information is returned about the p
> address given in
> .IR addr .
> This policy may be different from the process's default policy if
> -.BR set_mempolicy (2)
> -has been used to establish a policy for the page containing
> +.BR mbind (2)
> +or one of the helper functions described in
> +.BR numa(3)
> +has been used to establish a policy for the memory range containing
> .IR addr .
>
> -If
> -.I policy
> -is not NULL, then it is used to return the policy.
> +If the
> +.I mode
> +argument is not NULL, then
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will store the policy mode of the requested NUMA policy in the location
> +pointed to by this argument.
> If
> .IR nodemask
> -is not NULL, then it is used to return the nodemask associated
> -with the policy.
> +is not NULL, then the nodemask associated with the policy will be stored
> +in the location pointed to by this argument.
> .I maxnode
> -is the maximum bit number plus one that can be stored into
> -.IR nodemask .
> -The bit number is always rounded to a multiple of
> -.IR "unsigned long" .
> -.\"
> -.\" If
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specifies both
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_NODE
> -.\" and
> -.\" .BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> -.\" then
> -.\" .I policy
> -.\" instead returns the number of the node on which the address
> -.\" .I addr
> -.\" is allocated.
> -.\"
> -.\" If
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specifies
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_NODE
> -.\" but not
> -.\" .BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> -.\" and the process's current policy is
> -.\" .BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
> -.\" then
> -.\" checkme: Andi's text below says that the info is returned in
> -.\" 'nodemask', not 'policy':
> -.\" .I policy
> -.\" instead returns the number of the next node that will be used for
> -.\" interleaving allocation.
> -.\" FIXME .
> -.\" The other valid flag is
> -.\" .I MPOL_F_NODE.
> -.\" It is only valid when the policy is
> -.\" .I MPOL_INTERLEAVE.
> -.\" In this case not the interleave mask, but an unsigned long with the next
> -.\" node that would be used for interleaving is returned in
> -.\" .I nodemask.
> -.\" Other flag values are reserved.
> +specifies the number of node ids
> +that can be stored into
> +.IR nodemask \(emthat
> +is, the maximum node id plus one.
> +The value specified by
> +.I maxnode
> +is always rounded to a multiple of
> +.IR "sizeof(unsigned long)" .
> +
> +If
> +.I flags
> +specifies both
> +.B MPOL_F_NODE
> +and
> +.BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will return the node id of the node on which the address
> +.I addr
> +is allocated into the location pointed to by
> +.IR mode .
> +If no page has yet been allocated for the specified address,
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will allocate a page as if the process had performed a read
> +[load] access to that address, and return the id of the node
> +where that page was allocated.
> +
> +If
> +.I flags
> +specifies
> +.BR MPOL_F_NODE ,
> +but not
> +.BR MPOL_F_ADDR ,
> +and the process's current policy is
> +.BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
> +then
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will return in the location pointed to by a non-NULL
> +.I mode
> +argument,
> +the node id of the next node that will be used for
> +interleaving of internal kernel pages allocated on behalf of the process.
> +.\" Note: code returns next interleave node via 'mode' argument -lts
> +These allocations include pages for memory mapped files in
> +process memory ranges mapped using the
> +.IR mmap (2)
> +call with the
> +.I MAP_PRIVATE
> +flag for read accesses, and in memory ranges mapped with the
> +.I MAP_SHARED
> +flag for all accesses.
> +
> +Other flag values are reserved.
>
> For an overview of the possible policies see
> .BR set_mempolicy (2).
> @@ -120,40 +140,77 @@ returns 0;
> on error, \-1 is returned and
> .I errno
> is set to indicate the error.
> -.\" .SH ERRORS
> -.\" FIXME writeme -- no errors are listed on this page
> -.\" .
> -.\" .TP
> -.\" .B EINVAL
> -.\" .I nodemask
> -.\" is non-NULL, and
> -.\" .I maxnode
> -.\" is too small;
> -.\" or
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specified values other than
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_NODE
> -.\" or
> -.\" .BR MPOL_F_ADDR ;
> -.\" or
> -.\" .I flags
> -.\" specified
> -.\" .B MPOL_F_ADDR
> -.\" and
> -.\" .I addr
> -.\" is NULL.
> -.\" (And there are other EINVAL cases.)
> +.SH ERRORS
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +The value specified by
> +.I maxnode
> +is less than the number of node ids supported by the system.
> +Or
> +.I flags
> +specified values other than
> +.B MPOL_F_NODE
> +or
> +.BR MPOL_F_ADDR ;
> +or
> +.I flags
> +specified
> +.B MPOL_F_ADDR
> +and
> +.I addr
> +is NULL,
> +or
> +.I flags
> +did not specify
> +.B MPOL_F_ADDR
> +and
> +.I addr
> +is not NULL.
> +Or,
> +.I flags
> +specified
> +.B MPOL_F_NODE
> +but not
> +.B MPOL_F_ADDR
> +and the current process policy is not
> +.BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE .
> +(And there are other EINVAL cases.)
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +Part of all of the memory range specified by
> +.I nodemask
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +points outside your accessible address space.
> .SH NOTES
> -This manual page is incomplete:
> -it does not document the details the
> -.BR MPOL_F_NODE
> -flag,
> -which modifies the operation of
> -.BR get_mempolicy ().
> -This is deliberate: this flag is not intended for application use,
> -and its operation may change or it may be removed altogether in
> -future kernel versions.
> -.B Do not use it.
> +If the mode of the process policy or the policy governing allocations at the
> +specified address is
> +.I MPOL_PREFERRED
> +and this policy was installed with an empty
> +.IR nodemask \(emspecifying
> +local allocation,
> +.IR get_mempolicy ()
> +will return the mask of on-line node ids in the location pointed to by
> +a non-NULL
> +.I nodemask
> +argument.
> +This mask does not take into consideration any adminstratively imposed
> +restrictions on the process' context.
> +.\" "context" above refers to cpusets. No man page to reference. --lts
> +
> +.\" Christoph says the following is untrue. These are "fully supported."
> +.\" Andi concedes that he has lost this battle and approves [?]
> +.\" updating the man pages to document the behavior. --lts
> +.\" This manual page is incomplete:
> +.\" it does not document the details the
> +.\" .BR MPOL_F_NODE
> +.\" flag,
> +.\" which modifies the operation of
> +.\" .BR get_mempolicy ().
> +.\" This is deliberate: this flag is not intended for application use,
> +.\" and its operation may change or it may be removed altogether in
> +.\" future kernel versions.
> +.\" .B Do not use it.
> .SH "VERSIONS AND LIBRARY SUPPORT"
> See
> .BR mbind (2).
> @@ -161,6 +218,7 @@ See
> This system call is Linux specific.
> .SH SEE ALSO
> .BR mbind (2),
> +.BR mmap (2),
> .BR set_mempolicy (2),
> .BR numactl (8),
> .BR numa (3)
> Index: Linux/man2/set_mempolicy.2
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/man2/set_mempolicy.2 2007-04-12 18:42:49.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/man2/set_mempolicy.2 2007-06-01 12:28:49.000000000 -0400
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> .\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
> .\"
> .\" 2006-02-03, mtk, substantial wording changes and other improvements
> +.\" 2007-06-01, lts, more precise specification of behavior.
> .\"
> .TH SET_MEMPOLICY 2 "2006-02-07" "SuSE Labs" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> .SH NAME
> @@ -26,80 +27,141 @@ set_mempolicy \- set default NUMA memory
> .nf
> .B "#include <numaif.h>"
> .sp
> -.BI "int set_mempolicy(int " policy ", unsigned long *" nodemask ,
> +.BI "int set_mempolicy(int " mode ", unsigned long *" nodemask ,
> .BI " unsigned long " maxnode );
> +.sp
> +.BI "cc ... \-lnuma"
> .fi
> .SH DESCRIPTION
> .BR set_mempolicy ()
> -sets the NUMA memory policy of the calling process to
> -.IR policy .
> +sets the NUMA memory policy of the calling process,
> +which consists of a policy mode and zero or more nodes,
> +to the values specified by the
> +.IR mode ,
> +.I nodemask
> +and
> +.IR maxnode
> +arguments.
>
> A NUMA machine has different
> memory controllers with different distances to specific CPUs.
> -The memory policy defines in which node memory is allocated for
> +The memory policy defines from which node memory is allocated for
> the process.
>
> -This system call defines the default policy for the process;
> -in addition a policy can be set for specific memory ranges using
> +This system call defines the default policy for the process.
> +The process policy governs allocation of pages in the process'
> +address space outside of memory ranges
> +controlled by a more specific policy set by
> .BR mbind (2).
> +The process default policy also controls allocation of any pages for
> +memory mapped files mapped using the
> +.BR mmap (2)
> +call with the
> +.B MAP_PRIVATE
> +flag and that are only read [loaded] from by the task
> +and of memory mapped files mapped using the
> +.BR mmap (2)
> +call with the
> +.B MAP_SHARED
> +flag, regardless of the access type.
> The policy is only applied when a new page is allocated
> for the process.
> For anonymous memory this is when the page is first
> touched by the application.
>
> -Available policies are
> +The
> +.I mode
> +argument must specify one of
> .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ,
> .BR MPOL_BIND ,
> -.BR MPOL_INTERLEAVE ,
> +.B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> +or
> .BR MPOL_PREFERRED .
> -All policies except
> +All modes except
> .B MPOL_DEFAULT
> -require the caller to specify the nodes to which the policy applies in the
> +require the caller to specify via the
> .I nodemask
> -parameter.
> +parameter
> +one or more nodes.
> +
> .I nodemask
> -is pointer to a bit field of nodes that contains up to
> +points to a bit mask of node ids that contains up to
> .I maxnode
> bits.
> -The bit field size is rounded to the next multiple of
> +The bit mask size is rounded to the next multiple of
> .IR "sizeof(unsigned long)" ,
> but the kernel will only use bits up to
> .IR maxnode .
> +A NULL value of
> +.I nodemask
> +or a
> +.I maxnode
> +value of zero specifies the empty set of nodes.
> +If the value of
> +.I maxnode
> +is zero,
> +the
> +.I nodemask
> +argument is ignored.
>
> The
> .B MPOL_DEFAULT
> -policy is the default and means to allocate memory locally,
> +mode is the default and means to allocate memory locally,
> i.e., on the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation.
> .I nodemask
> -should be specified as NULL.
> +must be specified as NULL.
> +If the "local node" contains no free memory, the system will
> +attempt to allocate memory from a "near by" node.
>
> The
> .B MPOL_BIND
> -policy is a strict policy that restricts memory allocation to the
> +mode defines a strict policy that restricts memory allocation to the
> nodes specified in
> .IR nodemask .
> -There won't be allocations on other nodes.
> +If
> +.I nodemask
> +specifies more than one node, page allocations will come from
> +the node with the lowest numeric node id first, until that node
> +contains no free memory.
> +Allocations will then come from the node with the next highest
> +node id specified in
> +.I nodemask
> +and so forth, until none of the specified nodes contain free memory.
> +Pages will not be allocated from any node not specified in the
> +.IR nodemask .
>
> .B MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> -interleaves allocations to the nodes specified in
> -.IR nodemask .
> -This optimizes for bandwidth instead of latency.
> -To be effective the memory area should be fairly large,
> -at least 1MB or bigger.
> +interleaves page allocations across the nodes specified in
> +.I nodemask
> +in numeric node id order.
> +This optimizes for bandwidth instead of latency
> +by spreading out pages and memory accesses to those pages across
> +multiple nodes.
> +However, accesses to a single page will still be limited to
> +the memory bandwidth of a single node.
> +.\" NOTE: the following sentence doesn't make sense in the context
> +.\" of set_mempolicy() -- no memory area specified.
> +.\" To be effective the memory area should be fairly large,
> +.\" at least 1MB or bigger.
>
> .B MPOL_PREFERRED
> sets the preferred node for allocation.
> -The kernel will try to allocate in this
> -node first and fall back to other nodes if the preferred node is low on free
> +The kernel will try to allocate pages from this node first
> +and fall back to "near by" nodes if the preferred node is low on free
> memory.
> -Only the first node in the
> +If
> +.I nodemask
> +specifies more than one node id, the first node in the
> +mask will be selected as the preferred node.
> +If the
> .I nodemask
> -is used.
> -If no node is set in the mask, then the memory is allocated on
> -the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation allocation (like
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +arguments specify the empty set, then the memory is allocated on
> +the node of the CPU that triggered the allocation (like
> .BR MPOL_DEFAULT ).
>
> -The memory policy is preserved across an
> +The process memory policy is preserved across an
> .BR execve (2),
> and is inherited by child processes created using
> .BR fork (2)
> @@ -107,6 +169,9 @@ or
> .BR clone (2).
> .SH NOTES
> Process policy is not remembered if the page is swapped out.
> +When such a page is paged back in, it will use the policy of
> +the process or memory range that is in effect at the time the
> +page is allocated.
> .SH RETURN VALUE
> On success,
> .BR set_mempolicy ()
> @@ -114,12 +179,49 @@ returns 0;
> on error, \-1 is returned and
> .I errno
> is set to indicate the error.
> -.\" .SH ERRORS
> -.\" FIXME writeme -- no errors are listed on this page
> -.\" .
> -.\" .TP
> -.\" .B EINVAL
> -.\" .I mode is invalid.
> +.SH ERRORS
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +.I mode is invalid.
> +Or,
> +.I mode
> +is
> +.I MPOL_DEFAULT
> +and
> +.I nodemask
> +is non-empty,
> +or
> +.I mode
> +is
> +.I MPOL_BIND
> +or
> +.I MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> +and
> +.I nodemask
> +is empty.
> +Or,
> +.I maxnode
> +specifies more than a page worth of bits.
> +Or,
> +.I nodemask
> +specifies one or more node ids that are
> +greater than the maximum supported node id,
> +or are not allowed in the calling task's context.
> +.\" "calling task's context" refers to cpusets. No man page avail to ref. --lts
> +Or, none of the node ids specified by
> +.I nodemask
> +are on-line, or none of the specified nodes contain memory.
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +Part of all of the memory range specified by
> +.I nodemask
> +and
> +.I maxnode
> +points outside your accessible address space.
> +.TP
> +.B ENOMEM
> +Insufficient kernel memory was available.
> +
> .SH "VERSIONS AND LIBRARY SUPPORT"
> See
> .BR mbind (2).
> @@ -127,6 +229,7 @@ See
> This system call is Linux specific.
> .SH SEE ALSO
> .BR mbind (2),
> +.BR mmap (2),
> .BR get_mempolicy (2),
> .BR numactl (8),
> .BR numa (3)
>
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-29 19:33 [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-29 20:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-29 20:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 16:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-30 17:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 8:20 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-05-31 14:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 15:56 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-06-01 21:15 ` [PATCH] enhance memory policy sys call man pages v1 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-23 6:11 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2007-07-23 6:32 ` mbind.2 man page patch Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 14:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 17:19 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-26 18:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 18:18 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 6:32 ` get_mempolicy.2 " Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-28 9:31 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-09 18:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-09 20:57 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-16 20:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-18 5:50 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-21 15:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-22 4:10 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:08 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 1/3 - mbind.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:29 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:10 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 2/3 - set_mempolicy.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:30 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-22 16:12 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy Man Pages 2.64 3/3 - get_mempolicy.2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-27 11:30 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-08-27 10:46 ` get_mempolicy.2 man page patch Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-23 6:33 ` set_mempolicy.2 " Michael Kerrisk
2007-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-30 17:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 6:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 6:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 6:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 6:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 7:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 7:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 7:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 17:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 17:07 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 10:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 11:04 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 11:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 15:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 17:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 18:56 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 20:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 20:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 9:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 10:21 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 12:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 17:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 19:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 21:05 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 21:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 13:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-04 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 17:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-04 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-04 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 21:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-05 14:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 20:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-06-01 20:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 21:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-01 21:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-02 7:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 11:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 11:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 12:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 12:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2007-05-31 18:28 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 19:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-31 19:25 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-31 20:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-29 20:07 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 16:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A44699.3040105@gmx.net \
--to=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox