linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v4
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:05:48 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46805.81.207.0.53.1155413148.squirrel@81.207.0.53> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155408846.13508.115.camel@lappy>

On Sat, August 12, 2006 20:54, Peter Zijlstra said:
>  - single allocation group per packet - that is, when I free a packet
> and all its associated object I get my memory back.

This is easy.

>  - not waste too much space managing the various objects

This too, when ignoring clones and COW.

> skb operations want to allocate various sk_buffs for the same data
> clones. Also, it wants to be able to break the COW or realloc the data.

So this seems to be what adds all the complexity.

> So I tried manual packing (parts of that you have seen in previous
> attempts). This gets hard when you want to do unlimited clones and COW
> breaks. To do either you need to go link several pages.

It gets messy quite quickly, yes.

> So needing a list of pages and wanting packing gave me SROG. The biggest
> wart is having to deal with higher order pages. Explicitly coding in
> knowledge of the object you're packing just makes the code bigger - such
> is the power of abstraction.

I assume you meant "Not explicitly coding in", or else I'm tempted to disagree.
Abstraction that has only one user which uses it in one way only adds bloat.
But looking at the code a bit more I'm afraid you're right.

Greetings,

Indan


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-12 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-12 14:14 Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 14:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] pfn_to_kaddr() for UML Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 14:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] SROG allocator Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 14:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 14:41   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-12 15:06     ` rename *MEMALLOC flags (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core) Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 15:28       ` Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 15:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-14  0:06       ` rename *MEMALLOC flags Daniel Phillips
2006-08-14  1:00         ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-14  3:42           ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-12 17:31   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 17:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 17:54       ` Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 18:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 18:32           ` Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 18:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 19:45               ` Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 14:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] deadlock prevention for NBD Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-24 14:43   ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-12 16:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v4 Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 17:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 18:16     ` Indan Zupancic
2006-08-12 18:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-08-12 20:05         ` Indan Zupancic [this message]
2006-08-14  0:42         ` Daniel Phillips
2006-08-14  5:20           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-14 12:21             ` Rik van Riel
2006-08-14 12:51               ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-14 14:22                 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46805.81.207.0.53.1155413148.squirrel@81.207.0.53 \
    --to=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox