linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 16:12:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <464014B0.7060308@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463E5A00.6070708@redhat.com>

Rik van Riel wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
>> OK, sure. I think we need more numbers though.
> 
> 
> Thinking about the issue some more, I think I know just the
> number we might want to know.
> 
> It is pretty obvious that the kernel needs to do less work
> with the MADV_FREE code present.  However, it is possible
> that userspace needs to do more work, by accessing pages
> that are not in the CPU cache, or in another CPU's cache.
> 
> In the test cases where you see similar performance on the
> workload with and without the MADV_FREE code, are you by any
> chance seeing lower system time and higher user time?

I didn't actually check system and user times for the mysql
benchmark, but that's exactly what I had in mind when I
mentioned the poor cache behaviour this patch could cause. I
definitely did see user times go up in benchmarks where I
measured.

We have percpu and cache affine page allocators, so when
userspace just frees a page, it is likely to be cache hot, so
we want to free it up so it can be reused by this CPU ASAP.
Likewise, when we newly allocate a page, we want it to be one
that is cache hot on this CPU.


> I think that maybe for 2.6.22 we should just alias MADV_FREE
> to run with the MADV_DONTNEED functionality, so that the glibc
> people can make the change on their side while we figure out
> what will be the best thing to do on the kernel side.
> 
> I'll send in a patch that does that once Linus has committed
> your most recent flood of patches.  What do you think?

I'll let you and Ulrich decide on that. Keep in mind that older
kernels (without the mmap_sem patch for MADV_DONTNEED) still
seem to get a pretty decent improvement from using MADV_DONTNEED,
so it is possible glibc will want to start using that anyway.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-08  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-28  4:43 Rik van Riel
2007-05-04 10:53 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-04 11:58   ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-04 23:49     ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-04 16:04   ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-04 23:47     ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-05  0:10       ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-06 22:43       ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-07  2:42         ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-07  4:56           ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-07  4:53             ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-07 16:51               ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-08  6:12         ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-05-08 14:59           ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-08 23:23             ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 18:35           ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-05-08 23:43             ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08  3:51       ` [PATCH] stub MADV_FREE implementation Rik van Riel
2007-05-08 23:05         ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 17:15           ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-09 16:38     ` [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory Hugh Dickins
2007-05-29 16:59   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=464014B0.7060308@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox