linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dgc@sgi.com,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Slab Defrag / Slab Targeted Reclaim and general Slab API changes
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 09:37:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463C3448.3040506@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463C1900.7060409@cosmosbay.com>

Eric Dumazet a ecrit :
> Christoph Lameter a ecrit :
> 
>>
>>> G. Being able to track the number of pages in a kmem_cache
>>>
>>>
>>> If you look at fs/buffer.c, you'll notice the bh_accounting, 
>>> recalc_bh_state()
>>> that might be overkill for large SMP configurations, when the real 
>>> concern is
>>> to be able to limit the bh's not to exceed 10% of LOWMEM.
>>>
>>> Adding a callback in slab_ops to track total number of pages in use 
>>> by a given
>>> kmem_cache would be good.
>>
>> Such functionality exists internal to SLUB and in the reporting tool. 
>> I can export that function if you need it.
>>
>>> Same thing for fs/file_table.c : nr_file logic
>>> (percpu_counter_dec()/percpu_counter_inc() for each file open/close) 
>>> could be
>>> simplified if we could just count the pages in use by filp_cachep 
>>> kmem_cache.
>>> The get_nr_files() thing is not worth the pain.
>>
>> Sure. What exactly do you want? The absolute number of pages of memory 
>> that the slab is using?
>>
>>     kmem_cache_pages_in_use(struct kmem_cache *) ?
>>
>> The call will not be too lightweight since we will have to loop over 
>> all nodes and add the counters in each per node struct for allocates 
>> slabs.
>>
>>
> 
> On a typical system, number of pages for 'filp' kmem_cache tends to be 
> stable
> 
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp              234727 374100    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    
> 8 : slabdata  24940  24940    135
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp              234776 374100    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    
> 8 : slabdata  24940  24940    168
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp              234728 374100    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    
> 8 : slabdata  24940  24940    180
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp              234724 374100    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    
> 8 : slabdata  24940  24940    174
> 
> So revert nr_files logic to a single integer would be enough, even for NUMA
> 
> int nr_pages_used_by_filp;
> int nr_pages_filp_limit;
> int filp_in_danger __read_mostly;
> 
> static void callback_pages_in_use_by_filp(int inc)
> {
>     int in_danger;
> 
>     nr_pages_used_by_filp += inc;
> 
>     in_danger = nr_pages_used_by_filp >= nr_pages_filp_limit;
>     if (in_danger != filp_in_danger)
>         filp_in_danger = in_danger;
> }
> 
> struct file *get_empty_filp(void)
> {
> ...
> if (filp_in_danger && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>     goto over;
> 
> ...
> }
> 
> 
> void __init files_init(unsigned long mempages)
> {
> ...
> nr_pages_filp_limit = (mempages * 10) / 100; /* 10% for filp use */
> ...
> }


This wont work of course : Once the pages limit is hit, file allocations would 
be forbidden until cache is shrinked.

Maybe callback should return a status, so that SLAB / SLUB can return ENOMEM

static int callback_pages_in_use_by_filp(int inc)
{
     int in_danger;

     nr_pages_used_by_filp += inc;

     in_danger = nr_pages_used_by_filp >= nr_pages_filp_limit;
     if (unlikely(in_danger != filp_in_danger))
         filp_in_danger = in_danger;
     if (unlikely(in_danger && inc > 0 && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
         nr_pages_used_by_filp -= inc;
         return -1;
     }
     return 0;
}

No more tests in get_empty_filp() : just call kmem_cache_alloc()

struct file *get_empty_filp(void)
{
...
f = kmem_cache_alloc(filp_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
...
}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-05  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-04 22:15 clameter
2007-05-04 22:15 ` [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors clameter
2007-05-05 10:14   ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-05 15:43     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-06 19:19   ` Bert Wesarg
2007-05-06 19:46     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-04 22:15 ` [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation clameter
2007-05-04 23:03   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05  1:04     ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-05  1:07       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05  5:32   ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-05 15:35     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 10:38   ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-05 15:42     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 17:11       ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-09 15:05   ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-09 16:34     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 22:15 ` [RFC 3/3] Support targeted reclaim and slab defrag for dentry cache clameter
2007-05-05  5:07 ` [RFC 0/3] Slab Defrag / Slab Targeted Reclaim and general Slab API changes Eric Dumazet
2007-05-05  5:14   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05  5:41     ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-05  7:37       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-05-05 15:39       ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463C3448.3040506@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox