From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dgc@sgi.com,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Slab Defrag / Slab Targeted Reclaim and general Slab API changes
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 09:37:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <463C3448.3040506@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463C1900.7060409@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet a ecrit :
> Christoph Lameter a ecrit :
>
>>
>>> G. Being able to track the number of pages in a kmem_cache
>>>
>>>
>>> If you look at fs/buffer.c, you'll notice the bh_accounting,
>>> recalc_bh_state()
>>> that might be overkill for large SMP configurations, when the real
>>> concern is
>>> to be able to limit the bh's not to exceed 10% of LOWMEM.
>>>
>>> Adding a callback in slab_ops to track total number of pages in use
>>> by a given
>>> kmem_cache would be good.
>>
>> Such functionality exists internal to SLUB and in the reporting tool.
>> I can export that function if you need it.
>>
>>> Same thing for fs/file_table.c : nr_file logic
>>> (percpu_counter_dec()/percpu_counter_inc() for each file open/close)
>>> could be
>>> simplified if we could just count the pages in use by filp_cachep
>>> kmem_cache.
>>> The get_nr_files() thing is not worth the pain.
>>
>> Sure. What exactly do you want? The absolute number of pages of memory
>> that the slab is using?
>>
>> kmem_cache_pages_in_use(struct kmem_cache *) ?
>>
>> The call will not be too lightweight since we will have to loop over
>> all nodes and add the counters in each per node struct for allocates
>> slabs.
>>
>>
>
> On a typical system, number of pages for 'filp' kmem_cache tends to be
> stable
>
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp 234727 374100 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60
> 8 : slabdata 24940 24940 135
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp 234776 374100 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60
> 8 : slabdata 24940 24940 168
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp 234728 374100 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60
> 8 : slabdata 24940 24940 180
> -bash-2.05b# grep filp /proc/slabinfo
> filp 234724 374100 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60
> 8 : slabdata 24940 24940 174
>
> So revert nr_files logic to a single integer would be enough, even for NUMA
>
> int nr_pages_used_by_filp;
> int nr_pages_filp_limit;
> int filp_in_danger __read_mostly;
>
> static void callback_pages_in_use_by_filp(int inc)
> {
> int in_danger;
>
> nr_pages_used_by_filp += inc;
>
> in_danger = nr_pages_used_by_filp >= nr_pages_filp_limit;
> if (in_danger != filp_in_danger)
> filp_in_danger = in_danger;
> }
>
> struct file *get_empty_filp(void)
> {
> ...
> if (filp_in_danger && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> goto over;
>
> ...
> }
>
>
> void __init files_init(unsigned long mempages)
> {
> ...
> nr_pages_filp_limit = (mempages * 10) / 100; /* 10% for filp use */
> ...
> }
This wont work of course : Once the pages limit is hit, file allocations would
be forbidden until cache is shrinked.
Maybe callback should return a status, so that SLAB / SLUB can return ENOMEM
static int callback_pages_in_use_by_filp(int inc)
{
int in_danger;
nr_pages_used_by_filp += inc;
in_danger = nr_pages_used_by_filp >= nr_pages_filp_limit;
if (unlikely(in_danger != filp_in_danger))
filp_in_danger = in_danger;
if (unlikely(in_danger && inc > 0 && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
nr_pages_used_by_filp -= inc;
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
No more tests in get_empty_filp() : just call kmem_cache_alloc()
struct file *get_empty_filp(void)
{
...
f = kmem_cache_alloc(filp_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
...
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-05 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-04 22:15 clameter
2007-05-04 22:15 ` [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors clameter
2007-05-05 10:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-05 15:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-06 19:19 ` Bert Wesarg
2007-05-06 19:46 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-04 22:15 ` [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation clameter
2007-05-04 23:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 1:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-05 1:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 5:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-05 15:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 10:38 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-05 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-09 15:05 ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-09 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 22:15 ` [RFC 3/3] Support targeted reclaim and slab defrag for dentry cache clameter
2007-05-05 5:07 ` [RFC 0/3] Slab Defrag / Slab Targeted Reclaim and general Slab API changes Eric Dumazet
2007-05-05 5:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 5:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-05 7:37 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-05-05 15:39 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=463C3448.3040506@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox