remap_file_pages support - lost messages?

remap_file_pages support - lost messages?

[Blaisorblade]

Andrew, last week I sent to you the patchset for remap_file_pages protection 
support, against 2.6.21-rc5-mm3. I got no response at all on that, even if I 
thought it would be merged in -mm. What happened? Should I resend it?
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list!
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: remap_file_pages support - lost messages?

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:12:57 +0200 Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:

> Andrew, last week I sent to you the patchset for remap_file_pages protection 
> support, against 2.6.21-rc5-mm3. I got no response at all on that, even if I 
> thought it would be merged in -mm. What happened? Should I resend it?

I saw them, and hung onto them for a week in the hope that someone would
get in and review them, but nobody did.

So I suppose you should resend, please.  Try cc'ing lkml as well - there
seems to be plenty of surplus labour over there ;)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: remap_file_pages support - lost messages?

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:12:57 +0200 Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew, last week I sent to you the patchset for remap_file_pages protection 
> > support, against 2.6.21-rc5-mm3. I got no response at all on that, even if I 
> > thought it would be merged in -mm. What happened? Should I resend it?
> 
> I saw them, and hung onto them for a week in the hope that someone would
> get in and review them, but nobody did.
> 
> So I suppose you should resend, please.  Try cc'ing lkml as well - there
> seems to be plenty of surplus labour over there ;)

I intended to go over it in detail, I just haven't found the time
yet :-(

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: remap_file_pages support - lost messages?

[Nick Piggin]

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:12:57 +0200 Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Andrew, last week I sent to you the patchset for remap_file_pages protection 
>>>support, against 2.6.21-rc5-mm3. I got no response at all on that, even if I 
>>>thought it would be merged in -mm. What happened? Should I resend it?
>>
>>I saw them, and hung onto them for a week in the hope that someone would
>>get in and review them, but nobody did.
>>
>>So I suppose you should resend, please.  Try cc'ing lkml as well - there
>>seems to be plenty of surplus labour over there ;)
> 
> 
> I intended to go over it in detail, I just haven't found the time
> yet :-(

Ditto. The fault handler / sigsegv code still seems a little bit unfortunate
(if it can't be improved then maybe it can at least be ifdef'ed), however I
hadn't seen the patchset since it had been using some weird pte encoding
conventions. Now that it is using a more formal encoding and its own not
present bit, that part of it looks much cleaner.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>