From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What to expect with the 2.6 VM
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:10:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <461030000.1057165809@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030702171159.GG23578@dualathlon.random>
> the major reason you didn't mention for remap_file_pages is the rmap
> avoidance. There's no rmap backing the remap_file_pages regions, so the
> overhead per task is reduced greatly and the box stops running oom
> (actually deadlocking for mainline thanks to the oom killer and NOFAIL
> default behaviour).
Maybe I'm just taking this out of context, and it's twisting my brain,
but as far as I know, the nonlinear vma's *are* backed by pte_chains.
That was the whole problem with objrmap having to do conversions, etc.
Am I just confused for some reason? I was pretty sure that was right ...
M.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-02 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-01 1:39 Mel Gorman
2003-06-30 17:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-01 20:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 21:41 ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-01 21:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-01 21:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 9:01 ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-01 2:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 3:02 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-01 3:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 3:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 3:29 ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-01 4:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 11:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-07-01 3:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01 4:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 6:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01 7:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 8:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01 9:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 14:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 16:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01 17:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 3:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 14:42 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 21:45 ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-01 22:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 21:46 ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-02 3:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 15:57 ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-02 17:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 17:10 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-07-02 17:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 17:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 18:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 18:05 ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-02 20:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 21:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 21:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 22:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 22:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 22:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 23:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 23:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 11:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 11:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 12:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 13:06 ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-03 13:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 18:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 19:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 19:32 ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-03 20:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 0:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04 1:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 2:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04 4:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 5:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04 8:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 23:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-05 0:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-05 0:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 18:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-03 18:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 19:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 22:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 0:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04 1:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-04 1:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-03 19:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 18:07 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=461030000.1057165809@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox