From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46035088.4060709@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:59:04 +1100 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation References: <20070322231559.GA22656@sgi.com> <46033311.1000101@yahoo.com.au> <20070322205038.6009989f.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20070322205038.6009989f.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Paul Jackson Cc: cpw@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Paul Jackson wrote: > Nick also wrote: > >>The problem was that Paul didn't think it followed cpus_exclusive >>correctly, and I don't think we ever got to the point of giving it >>a rigourous definition. > > >>>From Documentation/cpusets.txt: > > - A cpuset may be marked exclusive, which ensures that no other > cpuset (except direct ancestors and descendents) may contain > any overlapping CPUs or Memory Nodes. > > This seems like the same definition to me as you gave, and I just > agreed to in my previous post a few minutes ago. It seems rigourous > to me ;>. Yeah, see my earlier reply. Naturally I was confused as to the nature of my earlier confusion ;) -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org