From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] split file and anonymous page queues #3
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:08:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4601586E.302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17921.20299.7899.527765@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Generally speaking, multi-queue replacement mechanisms were tried in the
> past, and they all suffer from the common drawback: once scanning rate
> is different for different queues, so is the notion of "hotness",
> measured by scanner. As a result multi-queue scanner fails to capture
> working set properly.
You realize that the current "single" queue in the 2.6 kernel
has this problem in a much worse way: when swappiness is low
and the kernel does not want to reclaim mapped pages, it will
randomly rotate those pages around the list.
In addition, the referenced bit on unmapped page cache pages
was ignored completely, making it impossible for the VM to
separate the page cache working set from transient pages due
to streaming IO.
I agree that we should put some more negative feedback in
place if it turns out we need it. I have refault code ready
that can be plugged into this patch, but I don't want to add
the overhead of such code if it turns out we do not actually
need it.
--
All Rights Reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-21 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-20 22:08 Rik van Riel
2007-03-21 1:07 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-21 19:11 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-21 8:44 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-03-21 11:24 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-21 11:48 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-03-21 12:01 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-21 12:03 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-21 15:29 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-03-21 16:08 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-03-21 22:18 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-03-21 16:12 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-03-21 16:56 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-20 22:06 Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4601586E.302@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox