Re: [RFC PATCH v6 2/5] mm: migrate: Add migrate_misplaced_folios_batch()

[Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>]

Hi Gregory

On 4/22/26 9:07 AM, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 08:56:59AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>> On 21-Apr-26 9:35 PM, Gregory Price wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 08:55:02PM +0530, Donet Tom wrote:
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * migrate_misplaced_folios_batch() - Batch variant of migrate_misplaced_folio
>>>>> + * Attempts to migrate a folio list to the specified destination.
>>>>> + * @folio_list: Isolated list of folios to be batch-migrated.
>>>>> + * @node: The NUMA node ID to where the folios should be migrated.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Caller is expected to have isolated the folios by calling
>>>>> + * migrate_misplaced_folio_prepare(), which will result in an
>>>>> + * elevated reference count on the folio. All the isolated folios
>>>>> + * in the list must belong to the same memcg so that NUMA_PAGE_MIGRATE
>>>>> + * stat can be attributed correctly to the memcg.
>> ^ This is the expectation from the caller. pghot caller ensures this.
>> I could add a debug check in this routine to verify if that is indeed so.
>>
> Wondering if the interface name should somehow reflect this as well, to
> make it a bit clearer.

I agree—this would make the interface clearer.

-Donet

>
> ~Gregory