Re: [PATCH 1/3] Lumpy Reclaim V4

[Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 18:23 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> +                       /* The target page is in the block, ignore it. */
>> +                       if (unlikely(pfn == page_pfn))
>> +                               continue;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE
>> +                       /* Avoid holes within the zone. */
>> +                       if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
>> +                               break;
>> +#endif 
> 
> Would having something like:
> 
>         static inline int pfn_in_zone_hole(unsigned long pfn)
>         {
>         #ifdef CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE
>         	if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
>         		return 1;
>         #endif 
>         	return 0;
>         }
>         
> help us out?  page_is_buddy() and page_is_consistent() appear to do the
> exact same thing, with the same #ifdef.

Funny you mention that.  I have a patch hanging around which basically
does that.  I'd been planning to send it up.  It adds a
pfn_valid_within() which you use when you already know a relative page
within the MAX_ORDER block is valid.  I'd not sent it cause I thought
the name sucked.

-apw

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>