From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hugh@veritas.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:11:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DDF8F3.2020304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HKIUk-0006Sl-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>>>>>> +int set_page_dirty_mapping(struct page *page);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This aspect of the design seems intrusive to me. I didn't see a strong
>>>>>> reason to introduce new versions of many of the routines just to handle
>>>>>> these semantics. What motivated this part of your design? Why the new
>>>>>> _mapping versions of routines?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Because there's no way to know inside the set_page_dirty() functions
>>>>> if the dirtying comes from a memory mapping or from a modification
>>>>> through a normal write(). And they have different semantics, for
>>>>> write() the modification times are updated immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Perhaps I didn't understand what page_mapped() does, but it does seem to
>>>> have the right semantics as far as I could see.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The problems will start, when you have a file that is both mapped and
>>> modified with write(). Then the dirying from the write() will set the
>>> flag, and that will have undesirable consequences.
>>>
>> I don't think that I quite follow the logic. The dirtying from write()
>> will set the flag, but then the mtime will get updated and the flag will
>> be cleared by the hook in file_update_time(). Right?
>>
>
> Take this example:
>
> fd = open()
> addr = mmap(.., fd)
> write(fd, ...)
> close(fd)
> sleep(100)
> msync(addr,...)
> munmap(addr)
>
> The file times will be updated in write(), but with your patch, the
> bit in the mapping will also be set.
>
> Then in msync() the file times will be updated again, which is wrong,
> since the memory was _not_ modified through the mapping.
This is correct. I have updated my proposed patch to include the clearing
of AS_MCTIME in the routine which updates the mtime field. I haven't
reposted it yet until I complete testing of the new resulting system. I
anticipate doing this later today.
Thanx..
ps
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 17:51 Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:07 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:54 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 19:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:36 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:16 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:11 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2007-02-22 20:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:50 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-21 18:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-21 18:50 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 4:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-22 7:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:39 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:14 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:55 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 21:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-22 21:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 21:52 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 22:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DDF8F3.2020304@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox