linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Take anonymous pages off the LRU if we have no swap
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:13:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DD88E3.2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702211900340.29703@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
>>>> http://linux-mm.org/PageReplacementDesign
>>> I do not see how this issue would be solved there.
>> If there is no swap space, we do not bother scanning the anonymous
>> page pool.  When swap space becomes available, we may end up scanning
>> it again.
> 
> Ok. This is for linux 3.0?

No, I think the changes can be introduced one at a time,
after each change gets benchmarked.

>> I would like to move the kernel towards something that fixes all
>> of the problem workloads, instead of thinking about one problem
>> at a time and reintroducing bugs for other workloads.
> 
> Problem workloads appear as machines grow to handle more memory.

Absolutely.  I am convinced that the whole "swappiness" thing
of scanning past the anonymous pages in order to find the page
cache pages will fall apart on 256GB systems even with somewhat
friendly workloads.

It is already falling apart on some workloads with 32GB systems
today...

>> Changes still need to be introduced incrementally, of course, but
>> I think it would be good if we had an idea where we were headed
>> in the medium (or even long) term.
> 
> That is difficult to foresee. I am pretty happy right now with what we 
> have and it seems to be adaptable enough for different workloads. I am a 
> bit concerned about the advanced page replacement algorithms since we 
> toyed with them and only found advantages for specialized workloads. LRU 
> is simple and easy to handle.

Linux hasn't been near LRU since the 2.3 days.

-- 
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is.  Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-22 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-21 22:12 Christoph Lameter
2007-02-21 23:17 ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-22  0:06   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22  2:17     ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-22  3:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22 12:13         ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-02-22 15:35           ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-22 17:04             ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-22 17:21 ` Paul Menage
2007-02-22 18:45   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45DD88E3.2@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox