From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubreylee@gmail.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
"Henn, erich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Limit the size of the pagecache
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:27:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B8EF74.6010704@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B8D5AB.8040803@redhat.com>
Rik van Riel wrote:
> Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>> Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>>> There are a few databases out there that mmap the whole
>>> thing. Sleepycat for one...
>>
>> That is why my suggestion would be not to touch mmapped pagecache
>> pages in the current pagecache limit code. The limit should concern
>> only unmapped pagecache pages.
>
> So you want to limit how much data the kernel caches for mysql
> or postgresql, but not limit how much of the rpm database is
> cached ?!
>
> IMHO your proposal does the exact opposite of what would be
> right for my systems :)
>
<Jumping in late into the discussion>
One scenario I can think of is
A group of I/O intensive task can cause readahead and
dirty page I/O and make good forward progress, but
they'll hit another group of processes by swapping
their pages out. How do we make fair forward progress?
The system administrator can currently control the
amount of swappiness by setting it, but swappiness is
a reclaim time control parameter.
We can control dirty page I/O by setting vm_dirty_ratio.
Readahead is also tuneable with fadvise(), but not many
applications use fadvise.
The question now is, is it easier for the system administrator
to say, limit my page cache usage to say 30% of total memory available,
so that other allocations do not have to wait on disk I/O or page
reclaim (consider slab allocations, other kernel data structures).
A low priority task might run infrequently and end up spending all
it's time either swapping in pages or reclaiming memory and by
the time it runs again, it ends up doing the same thing.
I understand the swap token mitigates this problem to some extent,
but limiting the page cache will give the system administrator
control over system memory behaviour.
--
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-24 0:49 Christoph Lameter
2007-01-24 2:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-24 3:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-24 5:47 ` Aubrey Li
2007-01-24 3:00 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-24 3:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-24 3:51 ` Aubrey Li
2007-01-24 4:03 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-26 10:27 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-24 3:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-24 4:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-24 5:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-25 0:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-25 2:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-25 3:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-25 4:28 ` Rik van Riel
2007-01-25 5:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-25 5:40 ` Rik van Riel
2007-01-25 6:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-26 10:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-26 18:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-01-24 7:04 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-01-24 7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-01-24 12:50 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-24 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-01-24 14:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-24 20:06 ` Erik Andersen
2007-01-25 2:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-25 8:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-01-24 14:22 ` Aubrey Li
2007-01-24 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-01-25 2:27 ` Aubrey Li
2007-01-24 12:33 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-01-24 14:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-25 4:17 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-01-25 4:45 ` Rik van Riel
2007-01-25 5:49 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-01-25 16:07 ` Rik van Riel
2007-01-25 17:57 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-01-25 6:35 ` Aubrey Li
2007-01-25 6:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-25 7:49 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-01-25 4:18 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] <7GEEK-4lH-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7GLdb-5Uz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7GRix-7fU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7GRLZ-7Uy-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-01-25 14:51 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B8EF74.6010704@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=aubreylee@gmail.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox