From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" <shai@scalex86.org>,
pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@calsoftinc.com>
Subject: Re: High lock spin time for zone->lru_lock under extreme conditions
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:39:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45A86291.8090408@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070112160104.GA5766@localhost.localdomain>
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> Hi,
> We noticed high interrupt hold off times while running some memory intensive
> tests on a Sun x4600 8 socket 16 core x86_64 box. We noticed softlockups,
[...]
> We did not use any lock debugging options and used plain old rdtsc to
> measure cycles. (We disable cpu freq scaling in the BIOS). All we did was
> this:
>
> void __lockfunc _spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> local_irq_disable();
> ------------------------> rdtsc(t1);
> preempt_disable();
> spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> _raw_spin_lock(lock);
> ------------------------> rdtsc(t2);
> if (lock->spin_time < (t2 - t1))
> lock->spin_time = t2 - t1;
> }
>
> On some runs, we found that the zone->lru_lock spun for 33 seconds or more
> while the maximal CS time was 3 seconds or so.
What is the "CS time"?
It would be interesting to know how long the maximal lru_lock *hold* time is,
which could give us a better indication of whether it is a hardware problem.
For example, if the maximum hold time is 10ms, that it might indicate a
hardware fairness problem.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-13 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-12 16:01 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-12 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-01-12 19:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-12 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-12 21:40 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-12 21:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-13 1:00 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-13 7:42 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13 4:39 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-01-13 7:36 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13 7:53 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-13 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-13 19:53 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-16 2:56 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45A86291.8090408@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pravin.shelar@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox