linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" <shai@scalex86.org>,
	pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@calsoftinc.com>
Subject: Re: High lock spin time for zone->lru_lock under extreme conditions
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:39:45 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45A86291.8090408@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070112160104.GA5766@localhost.localdomain>

Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> Hi,
> We noticed high interrupt hold off times while running some memory intensive
> tests on a Sun x4600 8 socket 16 core x86_64 box.  We noticed softlockups,

[...]

> We did not use any lock debugging options and used plain old rdtsc to
> measure cycles.  (We disable cpu freq scaling in the BIOS). All we did was
> this:
> 
> void __lockfunc _spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
> {
>         local_irq_disable();
>         ------------------------> rdtsc(t1);
>         preempt_disable();
>         spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
>         _raw_spin_lock(lock);
>         ------------------------> rdtsc(t2);
>         if (lock->spin_time < (t2 - t1))
>                 lock->spin_time = t2 - t1;
> }
> 
> On some runs, we found that the zone->lru_lock spun for 33 seconds or more
> while the maximal CS time was 3 seconds or so.

What is the "CS time"?

It would be interesting to know how long the maximal lru_lock *hold* time is,
which could give us a better indication of whether it is a hardware problem.

For example, if the maximum hold time is 10ms, that it might indicate a
hardware fairness problem.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-01-13  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-12 16:01 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-12 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-01-12 19:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-12 21:25   ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-12 21:40   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-12 21:45     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-13  1:00       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13  1:11         ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-13  7:42           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13  4:39 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-01-13  7:36   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13  7:53     ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-13  8:00     ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-13 19:53       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-01-13 21:20         ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-16  2:56           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45A86291.8090408@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pravin.shelar@calsoftinc.com \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox