linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Paul Cameron Davies <pauld@cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	David Singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com
Subject: Re: new procfs memory analysis feature
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:46:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4579DD22.70609@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612081716440.28861@weill.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU>

Paul Cameron Davies wrote:
> The PTI gathers all the open coded iterators togethers into one place,
> which would be a good precursor to providing generic iterators for
> non performance critical iterations.
>
> We are completing the updating/enhancements to this PTI for the latest
> kernel, to be released just prior to LCA.  This PTI is benchmarking
> well. We also plan to release the experimental guarded page table
> (GPT) running under this PTI.

I looked at implementing linear pagetable mappings for x86 as a way of
getting rid of CONFIG_HIGHPTE, and to make pagetable manipulations
generally more efficient.  I gave up on it after a while because all the
existing pagetable accessors are not suitable for a linear pagetable,
and I didn't want to have to introduce a pile of new pagetable
interfaces.  Would the PTI interface be helpful for this?

Thanks,
    J

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-08 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <45789124.1070207@mvista.com>
2006-12-07 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-08  0:30   ` david singleton
2006-12-08  1:07   ` david singleton
2006-12-08  1:46     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-08  1:53       ` david singleton
2006-12-08  6:21   ` Paul Cameron Davies
2006-12-08 21:46     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2006-12-11  2:19       ` Paul Cameron Davies
2006-12-11  8:13 Albert Cahalan
2006-12-12  1:15 ` Joe Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4579DD22.70609@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dsingleton@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pauld@cse.unsw.EDU.AU \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox