Re: [PATCH] mseal: remove can_do_mseal

[Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>]

On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 07:33:09PM +0000, jeffxu@chromium.org wrote:
> From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Is that possible to squash this change on top of
> "mseal: move can_do_mseal to mseal.c" on the mm-unstable ?
>
> This is the first time I m doing this, because I saw dev did this before,
> and saying this is the prefered approach.
>
> I could also send v2 which is what I usually do.
>
> Thanks
> -Jeff
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>

Hi Jeff,

Fix-patches and the like are usually for stuff that's been taken and this, I
don't believe has (I might be wrong actually).

But anyway, as a reviewer it's easier for me to deal with a v2 in this case, I
am not going to give tags to the original version of this and want to make it
explicit I am only giving them to the corrected version.

So from my perspective could you do a favour and send as a v2 as it makes my
life easier anyway? :)

Thanks, Lorenzo

> ---
>  mm/mseal.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mseal.c b/mm/mseal.c
> index e167220a0bf0..08e6f328d9c7 100644
> --- a/mm/mseal.c
> +++ b/mm/mseal.c
> @@ -225,9 +225,9 @@ int do_mseal(unsigned long start, size_t len_in, unsigned long flags)
>  	unsigned long end;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>
> -	ret = can_do_mseal(flags);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	/* Verify flags not set. */
> +	if (flags)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>
>  	start = untagged_addr(start);
>  	if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(start))
> --
> 2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
>