From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: "Patrick.Le-Dot" <Patrick.Le-Dot@bull.net>
Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, dev@openvz.org,
haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, rohitseth@google.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/8] RSS controller task migration support
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:04:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <455DE480.7000500@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061117132533.A5FCF1B6A2@openx4.frec.bull.fr>
Patrick.Le-Dot wrote:
>> ...
>> For implementing guarantees, we can use limits. Please see
>> http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Guarantees_for_resources.
>
> Nack.
>
> This seems to be correct for resources like cpu, disk or network
> bandwidth but not for the memory just because nobody in this wiki
> speaks about the kswapd and page reclaim (but it's true that a such
> demon does not exist for cpu, disk or... then the problem is more
> simple).
>
> For a customer the main reason to use guarantee is to be sure that
> some pages of a job remain in memory when the system is low on free
> memory. This should be true even for a job in group/container A with
> a smooth activity compared to a group/container B with a set of jobs
> using memory more agressively...
>
I am not against guarantees, but
Consider the following scenario, let's say we implement guarantees
1. If we account for kernel resources, how do you provide guarantees
when you have non-reclaimable resources?
2. If a customer runs a system with swap turned off (which is quite
common), then anonymous memory becomes irreclaimable. If a group
takes more than it's fair share (exceeds its guarantee), you
have scenario similar to 1 above.
> What happens if we use limits to implement guarantees ?
>
>>> ...
>>> The idea of getting a guarantee is simple:
>>> if any group gi requires a Gi units of resource from R units available
>>> then limiting all the rest groups with R - Gi units provides a desired
>>> guarantee
>
> If the limit is a "hard limit" then we have implemented reservation and
> this is too strict.
>
> If the limit is a "soft limit" then group/container B is autorized to
> use more than the limit and nothing is guaranteed for group/container A...
>
> Patrick
Yes, but it is better than failing to meet a guarantee (if guarantees are
desired :))
--
Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-17 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-17 13:25 Patrick.Le-Dot
2006-11-17 14:05 ` Alan
2006-11-17 16:34 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-17 14:42 Patrick.Le-Dot
2006-11-15 11:59 Patrick.Le-Dot
2006-11-15 16:37 ` [ckrm-tech] " Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=455DE480.7000500@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=Patrick.Le-Dot@bull.net \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox