linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bug in try_to_free_pages and balance_pgdat when they fail to reclaim pages
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:18:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <453475A4.2000504@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453425A5.5040304@google.com>

Martin Bligh wrote:

> The same bug is contained in both try_to_free_pages and balance_pgdat.
> On reclaiming the requisite number of pages we correctly set
> prev_priority back to DEF_PRIORITY.


AFAIKS, we set prev_priority to the priority at which the zone was
deemed to require no more reclaiming, not DEF_PRIORITY.

> However, we ALSO do this even
> if we loop over all priorities and fail to reclaim.


If that happens, shouldn't prev_priority be set to 0?

I don't agree the patch is correct.

>
> Setting prev_priority artificially high causes reclaimers to set
> distress artificially low, and fail to reclaim mapped pages, when
> they are, in fact, under severe memory pressure (their priority
> may be as low as 0). This causes the OOM killer to fire incorrectly.
>
> This patch changes that to set prev_priority to 0 instead, if we
> fail to reclaim.


We saw problems with this before releasing SLES10 too. See
zone_is_near_oom and other changesets from around that era. I would
like to know what workload was prevented from going OOM with these
changes, but zone_is_near_oom didn't help -- it must have been very
marginal (or there may indeed be a bug somewhere).

Nick
--

>
> Signed-off-by: Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@google.com>

>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>diff -aurpN -X /home/mbligh/.diff.exclude linux-2.6.18/mm/vmscan.c 2.6.18-prev_reset/mm/vmscan.c
>--- linux-2.6.18/mm/vmscan.c	2006-09-20 12:24:42.000000000 -0700
>+++ 2.6.18-prev_reset/mm/vmscan.c	2006-10-16 17:23:48.000000000 -0700
>@@ -962,7 +962,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zones(int pr
> unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zone **zones, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> 	int priority;
>-	int ret = 0;
> 	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
> 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
> 	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>@@ -1000,8 +999,15 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
> 		}
> 		total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
> 		if (nr_reclaimed >= sc.swap_cluster_max) {
>-			ret = 1;
>-			goto out;
>+			for (i = 0; zones[i] != 0; i++) {
>+				struct zone *zone = zones[i];
>+
>+				if (!cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, __GFP_HARDWALL))
>+					continue;
>+
>+				zone->prev_priority = zone->temp_priority;
>+			}
>+			return 1;
> 		}
> 
> 		/*
>@@ -1021,16 +1027,15 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
> 		if (sc.nr_scanned && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> 			blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
> 	}
>-out:
> 	for (i = 0; zones[i] != 0; i++) {
> 		struct zone *zone = zones[i];
> 
> 		if (!cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, __GFP_HARDWALL))
> 			continue;
> 
>-		zone->prev_priority = zone->temp_priority;
>+		zone->prev_priority = 0;
> 	}
>-	return ret;
>+	return 0;
> }
> 
> /*
>@@ -1186,7 +1191,10 @@ out:
> 	for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
> 		struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> 
>-		zone->prev_priority = zone->temp_priority;
>+		if (priority < 0)		/* we failed to reclaim */
>+			zone->prev_priority = 0;
>+		else
>+			zone->prev_priority = zone->temp_priority;
> 	}
> 	if (!all_zones_ok) {
> 		cond_resched();
>

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-17  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-17  0:36 Martin Bligh
2006-10-17  6:18 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-10-17  6:36   ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-17  6:48     ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-17 14:07       ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-17 17:03         ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=453475A4.2000504@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox