Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 23:52 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
>>What we could do then, is allocate pages in batches (we already do),
>>but only check watermarks if we have to go to the buddly allocator
>>(we don't currently do this, but really should anyway, considering
>>that the watermark checks are based on pages in the buddy allocator
>>rather than pages in buddy + pcp).
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the patch! I have a slight preference for the following
version, which speculatively tests pcp->count without disabling
interrupts (the chance of being preempted or scheduled in this
window is basically the same as the chance of being preempted after
checking watermarks). What do you think?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.