linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Joonsoo Kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Lobakin" <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@jfarr.cc>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] compiler_types: Introduce __flex_counter() and family
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:43:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44a00ad4-b05d-4fb8-87f2-fccbaa068872@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb6e6198-dc42-4a63-8d0d-35f3061ff388@intel.com>

On 3/17/25 10:26, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 3/15/25 04:15, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Introduce __flex_counter() which wraps __builtin_counted_by_ref(),
>> as newly introduced by GCC[1] and Clang[2]. Use of __flex_counter()
>> allows access to the counter member of a struct's flexible array member
>> when it has been annotated with __counted_by().
>>
>> Introduce typeof_flex_counter(), can_set_flex_counter(), and
>> set_flex_counter() to provide the needed _Generic() wrappers to get sane
>> results out of __flex_counter().
>>
>> For example, with:
>>
>>     struct foo {
>>         int counter;
>>         short array[] __counted_by(counter);
>>     } *p;
>>
>> __flex_counter(p->array) will resolve to: &p->counter
>>
>> typeof_flex_counter(p->array) will resolve to "int". (If p->array was not
>> annotated, it would resolve to "size_t".)
>>
>> can_set_flex_counter(p->array, COUNT) is the same as:
>>
>>     COUNT <= type_max(p->counter) && COUNT >= type_min(p->counter)
>>
>> (If p->array was not annotated it would return true since everything
>> fits in size_t.)
>>
>> set_flex_counter(p->array, COUNT) is the same as:
>>
>>     p->counter = COUNT;
>>
>> (It is a no-op if p->array is not annotated with __counted_by().)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> 
> I agree that there is no suitable fallback handy, but I see counter
> as integral part of the struct (in contrast to being merely annotation),
> IOW, without set_flex_counter() doing the assignment, someone will
> reference it later anyway, without any warning when kzalloc()'d
> 
> So, maybe BUILD_BUG() instead of no-op?

I get that so far this is only used as an internal helper (in the next
patch), so for me it would be also fine to just add __ prefix: 
__set_flex_counter(), at least until the following is true:
  "manual initialization of the flexible array counter is still
required (at some point) after allocation as not all compiler versions
support the __counted_by annotation yet"

> 
>> +#define set_flex_counter(FAM, COUNT)                \
>> +({                                \
>> +    *_Generic(__flex_counter(FAM),                \
>> +          void *:  &(size_t){ 0 },            \
>> +          default: __flex_counter(FAM)) = (COUNT);    \
>> +})
>> +
>>   #endif /* __LINUX_OVERFLOW_H */
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-15  3:15 [PATCH v4 0/2] slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() " Kees Cook
2025-03-15  3:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] compiler_types: Introduce __flex_counter() " Kees Cook
2025-03-15  4:53   ` Randy Dunlap
2025-03-15 18:34     ` Kees Cook
2025-03-15 19:47   ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-15 21:06     ` Kees Cook
2025-03-17  9:26   ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-03-17  9:43     ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2025-03-17 16:22       ` Kees Cook
2025-03-15  3:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() " Kees Cook
2025-03-15  5:18   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2025-03-15 18:02     ` Randy Dunlap
2025-03-15 18:39     ` Kees Cook
2025-03-15 18:31   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-15 18:56     ` Kees Cook
2025-03-15 19:06       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-10-07  2:07   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-10-07 17:17     ` Kees Cook
2025-10-07 17:47       ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-10-07 18:18         ` Marco Elver
2025-10-08  4:20           ` Kees Cook
2025-10-08  7:49             ` Vegard Nossum
2025-10-09 12:07               ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44a00ad4-b05d-4fb8-87f2-fccbaa068872@intel.com \
    --to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@jfarr.cc \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.ambardar@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox