From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B048C87FCB for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F15CD6B00A7; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EED4A6B00A9; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:47:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DB51D6B00AA; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:47:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72F16B00A7 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F7C81237 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:47:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83739654600.25.D50396A Received: from mx0a-00069f02.pphosted.com (mx0a-00069f02.pphosted.com [205.220.165.32]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63CC100003 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com header.s=corp-2025-04-25 header.b="PT/u51zY"; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com header.b=rb+dVjLM; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=oracle.com; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com designates 205.220.165.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com; arc=pass ("microsoft.com:s=arcselector10001:i=1") ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1754326017; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=PPmYCywvIDnEW3s1W4FTZtnyebgPPNRhhVvagH1diXw=; b=oV/B2B9LKJfr7DBWbJunpW9L0CqW77K+xnzlcxUlDrxw3MWe4HhnEs+4uGzwigX3pVRebw NQy0N4FNfxG4dkulMGdoAEjejfMcz/5m/qKrvLjeOeptw2b9Ky+X/KFH72wuW4MUsRqSI/ oKjxv5CMuX7WDDJtleGIE+Sq7jbL8Ok= ARC-Seal: i=2; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1754326017; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; b=BpooZqtzzidSlzAd9vzn3BPVZrLp02j0q2gxLMTzmqxqhrcQU9CvmKGJ94Cyp2iO7DTQvA wlcJjmWKh3cMBl41DbXBtVih0PKI+8CQQpvQa0oYZUUVaP5yVul3w0XevSThwkACcJwbYm ych2MZAL1N94CvAate1OqZPKQBwL6TQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com header.s=corp-2025-04-25 header.b="PT/u51zY"; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com header.b=rb+dVjLM; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=oracle.com; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com designates 205.220.165.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com; arc=pass ("microsoft.com:s=arcselector10001:i=1") Received: from pps.filterd (m0246627.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00069f02.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 574D7Qi2015840; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:46:34 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=corp-2025-04-25; bh=PPmYCywvIDnEW3s1W4 FTZtnyebgPPNRhhVvagH1diXw=; b=PT/u51zY/z5w2kXhxBGyqolDa/B0KwdZ0V D2peBOSLcdvs2xt5IoFu23TjP29nx5lF4plK2hdRuM/AIuGXnIHsVZsTXGhPrbTZ V5zR5TDRDSI7WdPpR9CdouAl3bUi1B2zD+3tTE72wFEsJ9NwRv0izuBMJonasDGd 7fI7c6Dqgb1zded2x8QqsjwaT6AJVmq86a0Bt+U7gLQx0gTP1t+KhXOG1EGVd8Mm ocVesxSlZG0EV6UQVg03g2br+uJkHAJec4ee5Cl3P5Uzn3a44HBUCn5xT9nzzsYl qHVKsn7DhnH4JnPOGlISOIX1T6d7j8cE2everYWnt62e2hqu2bEA== Received: from phxpaimrmta01.imrmtpd1.prodappphxaev1.oraclevcn.com (phxpaimrmta01.appoci.oracle.com [138.1.114.2]) by mx0b-00069f02.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 489994k2y8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 04 Aug 2025 16:46:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (phxpaimrmta01.imrmtpd1.prodappphxaev1.oraclevcn.com [127.0.0.1]) by phxpaimrmta01.imrmtpd1.prodappphxaev1.oraclevcn.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 574FY258025382; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:46:32 GMT Received: from nam11-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam11on2044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.223.44]) by phxpaimrmta01.imrmtpd1.prodappphxaev1.oraclevcn.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 48a7jsnc7h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 04 Aug 2025 16:46:32 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QQySTisnEUd+PgwVcBYc7fgjxFxsKfeBRaQeIdfLs7Bi6IV1gvTeZiRNhBG/mtwppQTr7dxBJaTmDLdxOIdabyQ0HcHrkhYLZbXbtb9+tddpgWFmJ3RxZx/h6a5Todw52QZB+xPF+Fp+6dicW8P6cjdOgdnGeHxsY0OZnDcdbnXdHR8Wy7hOF2NdYj07Qj1UeSGtH9PBFdAhJjZCAN7mf6GQKU1fIHIjBAeoL8TEtpr9niFuTxH8YYneSD3tyFqumJLVGKwbhVWblwDZHzaVWFrPqfksVpY++G38KhSIS91oZ6UzBpTDV/5/I26cM1Iju7+cxAJvm//g+bvLnJIdcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=PPmYCywvIDnEW3s1W4FTZtnyebgPPNRhhVvagH1diXw=; b=uviC4Ea1d8fizTo9PPHna2dKeqAOP+mAkVPzzuFnCWzwbFqC3tDLEXEs+SEoytJZL0o3NX/23CBBWaA9ZGQKOlgo70F727GdffREXAPtQfLT5m2D+7z85QnBJRRsxhGxoqz1tSH6PL+sYhoPSDHWWAYFue7fJlzgqU7Korzocsq9Sza7cBOKQpx+hKvXEsJcqY2lbVyCRWYo/bmCxzUKcoYdVSZJblwj/HQU+4ucnsB9fpZzAkRt689Ius2bqC7Tla99tShiNeNGXop3tR5G11hi5QqcfRmojFtx439oQDc2r5hQx+1DLKnYTEofAHIhvjiRuS37Zz7Qq/C253ETGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PPmYCywvIDnEW3s1W4FTZtnyebgPPNRhhVvagH1diXw=; b=rb+dVjLMI2WGNZgj4/JOLdEB/qUmvoTodaKOnhn6Yk97dgkn213q4S7Dd+cuJx74DOE/IPlkT6Zg6QHtTZSfuO/LwF+7GsM746B3RPHJh0xmYuy5fslbIjAwbzFQ1noxjSY0lsHlXpx/OE/kpY7L5AH1XmLR+rdWsjTThXQ8Zk0= Received: from DM4PR10MB8218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:8:1cc::16) by CYYPR10MB7673.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:930:cb::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8989.20; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:46:26 +0000 Received: from DM4PR10MB8218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2650:55cf:2816:5f2]) by DM4PR10MB8218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2650:55cf:2816:5f2%5]) with mapi id 15.20.8989.018; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 16:46:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 17:46:23 +0100 From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan , Ryan Roberts , Baolin Wang , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Vlastimil Babka , Zi Yan , Mike Rapoport , Dave Hansen , Michal Hocko , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Nico Pache , Dev Jain , "Liam R . Howlett" , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, willy@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" , mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, hch@lst.de, Pankaj Raghav Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: add static huge zero folio Message-ID: <4463bc75-486d-4034-a19e-d531bec667e8@lucifer.local> References: <20250804121356.572917-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> <20250804121356.572917-4-kernel@pankajraghav.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250804121356.572917-4-kernel@pankajraghav.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: AS4PR09CA0025.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:5d4::15) To DM4PR10MB8218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:8:1cc::16) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM4PR10MB8218:EE_|CYYPR10MB7673:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b99af156-af8c-47ef-fd06-08ddd37673ef X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|1800799024|366016|376014|7416014; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: =?us-ascii?Q?6p9NX/7yyPZCOo8xEd8xP9v9EzaSn4KLv5ir0asiZwJjysKsjd8hhiPZBxXp?= =?us-ascii?Q?+uPke/VOCER+mNDaVWJ9i7fo2yNL9YHhA5qaic7dvyyQo2pEuI2oMQ/FWLA/?= =?us-ascii?Q?vEOPNvZWVIUmGpDbsdTBHee1VHeZHnSRmX6Yuc/1yrk3MVoVOUjulMxJweos?= =?us-ascii?Q?2pB4mHgDRPeR7c+aidQAG/2tWD0uT/alYwqgksKCGFH41Lkv7+i2kXutUa0O?= =?us-ascii?Q?+WaxADSK3fV8CkK/02pI/MTalEx11Ner7p6dW9q6wwliddQ+6P+O4yK2J8uS?= =?us-ascii?Q?EC9yMUFf2hLQcTtkjy3dMjoc9N6OsXRgM8IjNzXCnqYsO0+6pqpPrnUVPNi6?= =?us-ascii?Q?qdUT6ZPdCMBRS5FLyN8w3+UTC0xOuP6s1PuTOZI+BQ5ZRHVO/AqTmCMsziy+?= =?us-ascii?Q?YD0vRv7JJe0kflTm7ocnAKzXrlZC+Qh9gAYwtaSGvX/QRMWSMuWqktePQNO/?= =?us-ascii?Q?5k+UlmihOLwmNoaexAouK+zh+dj7IyNKoZFflvbEzs/kZlqPABK6lp6ITmyq?= =?us-ascii?Q?gWHi2dqqlHjDekCy9JU864XPM2xsAJTkfholKMTRlqd6QmQCkPIxex137XrC?= =?us-ascii?Q?Pc6hJHM3jVMmXNPQ0P3nyCwatV+fFKb+MLptkdINHN96l12LMKj6XjgFce3J?= =?us-ascii?Q?5fXYjvz0+VQRtKz1j36JWlWPP0ZZ7axsNNKUE5Eq6KQd1q6bMYHCbTV4kaHF?= =?us-ascii?Q?1zrXBQ5Bxd/CjyCtv/nM/4RcgXcnQxog2ZTxSw6ibhu7cHmhXx5JA41vtB6C?= =?us-ascii?Q?HIoaTvr0TqeXNpM0ljHmHPNzGyD1kLZf5/hbtIHHZKlcLu+tTMfn7Mly9Hp4?= =?us-ascii?Q?B/8+r1fq4PdLVah9vQOeL38F487cOllDDHa8v2qANViO5jFQPfn2F3Jqw11N?= =?us-ascii?Q?ReqnvrKI5sp4wq/VcGULRfiZO5lUc1tSsIX6ti3mBMm858aNJEYm40wlDF3H?= =?us-ascii?Q?p6pqDLw/1WuS+X3zP9OKSQ2SCRhMYJ26SHvGJF3+hhqOL//5w2Z7cmGnwgxb?= =?us-ascii?Q?IXTvhrKXCSZEDEzgAMhfCoQoes4ueEJGJ5QUXRXxkWaFh4JbB6oebL2nwdXn?= =?us-ascii?Q?M4S8lwATAa7W4owvfQIWx4JspqELF+GsqZBUUmlVDPcmmd3qIRBTxFrwIVpb?= =?us-ascii?Q?/PIp4FKYaN7nY/tP+/2XYKstRKf8XuK1b2vBriyjweQ/hKd9ZfXGQrCVvfID?= =?us-ascii?Q?ePkSMWT/c59RGUzvDfmh9OrGvFj+1/fDKS9Xu28EvbfuMA7UnJ3bxRrQ/iaa?= =?us-ascii?Q?89uLVa6XgbWUzfg14kyV3hMRL+XP1wPonRrRFT1+NjyvtCspyD+YHuplLUTO?= =?us-ascii?Q?4QsF6lPKAqABHyhRWqQsAa5zpldh0PRew82lCsKw4hvz0ZHhxDcjV3Sxn1H/?= =?us-ascii?Q?XfC7mkpBXNnVOwZxQZyhqJUSI8XSPQp+unQzIE4A8YRFqneMZB3P57GJMKKa?= =?us-ascii?Q?oP0a19tYzDI=3D?= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:DM4PR10MB8218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(1800799024)(366016)(376014)(7416014);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?l2dyCoL80drwFi4ktEon9nwMnLI5YVtx/37M90FtE0HpixnYxnrG8NhXOUNv?= =?us-ascii?Q?vWzW5bAnFJwzehY8xpuKpxtXWzU1UR/GSmAvijEWJ4qJ4MZJiMmXWM/rjB4X?= =?us-ascii?Q?4I9m6VW3NhXuycC0TVMgIptSIStqcU+1HrzyWqsUJt0t5zN+EnkM4oAyBmmP?= =?us-ascii?Q?yJ2Ta3j14Jy/1VFdkF6UzTfs+bicdtyo8lCg1iG8JEu/Sz4NuL3KZVFK9PKk?= =?us-ascii?Q?M74XxPgUemAOHMJMa5JOABQ7TqJJ6p4iAXZQbyzOk/Bc87pqp/tqxq4uaVZJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?RHSXL6SEf0//FprVBSkcvdr9YvEtDFcusw5/bO1MJhiGLcU3JNuDehHkkXbz?= =?us-ascii?Q?X5FtoEZAzPDgoRybJqNCGCpKKv5PsRHA72X5f7yEaqHG/4ga357oXbkjSnXx?= =?us-ascii?Q?AIZkg4Fj7mDkzuP+MvWL/18TsHr0B6T4sEL+qImwfl7kaxQ5wI63fBBW18ZJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?GIsKNtBKZXtpT0k1aOjNwhZMwK4tvnZXIl3TF9X9ZN4xgIGpuz49KsN4sRFW?= =?us-ascii?Q?dzRxYPiNsgMttCfWRtpOJiSEe9NvitohNJrKnc1pqCkTkt6vGD85e+7KG3Vp?= =?us-ascii?Q?Yg70iMTdMCvtE7/McjshxNuwWjvt/+67h+ImfCHI7i18ZQQeACUbL9YUeKxn?= =?us-ascii?Q?7oymy2DT4hZlVn6ZpRiwQmRhyxzoMG1XLiPa40lv8F8XvKx+Rv/+TdtWOudI?= =?us-ascii?Q?umCUTD2P7fL6jPeBXe5xEduoExzDrngRGKMOL52Opt1bhHNduSzpf4/mA5mJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?ubmAUShpnNCPysuZA6i4k97jUbZlen5JHEtNgi/+fJJxzKIqejHZoAa+Es0U?= =?us-ascii?Q?Dx9Yx2jaW9qnLcEsKGCQJgiBOegXuLVOP3mUYDFmEiOEw3bXoVbjGutLhXjw?= =?us-ascii?Q?HJqWhO+OkF8m7nWnmrCCRuklCzQEKxvl5M0pKGiZB1dJn6PLgSddutMkY7eM?= =?us-ascii?Q?wPokiOy17QTZgzv2MdSsvd91PwiykvtxWQPUjoAyS7QhFwL6szxL59dDeTDP?= =?us-ascii?Q?DqHJBeK0vtTF2E2iE9mEDOlhYE/SZKaEOoI2vfVn/MaEeaZq50kG0VmRMGcy?= =?us-ascii?Q?O/246a5C7j6ufS3uKf2EkH35MgBh+tKkpPEN6672szht3BuVKukB694P9w7h?= =?us-ascii?Q?zpB1nRhP0WnOA09zs3hjX1bqzE02JdFFDZxY9BX6SuIpwPCe1d8i3T5Ejs4R?= =?us-ascii?Q?XqtqfxVR468kDjH6SoFtH5OUZhDtTVQbZBMn92/VTZ7rPWNp5LgIXIwrfFnR?= =?us-ascii?Q?GlBE2mR3gkSpecNEtJ97AfzdC2vGQ8IPR2PcEVF9Hs/btPysxr/ZQLRWZ8ah?= =?us-ascii?Q?wt3NgqeKugZrmODmDq8CceE1VXlikjhCNFj7RQAxo1Ym3X7/TDd4QVb1f5do?= =?us-ascii?Q?Cjug7oTlprqH0WnFBOw+KkvbCG/O6dvgClbAPaW47FNdW8Mhe6kHr2tJWiP5?= =?us-ascii?Q?WwY21TEOeWDw2yGJaygODCUkQjSceAc45IXrbHmSNY+tfegLUNMLTrwNDHK2?= =?us-ascii?Q?nMT93G9HOcDTa62Gm9HZf52xNb1byT0GWGMN8JIZeojbwhQTAHglH8JzbDH6?= =?us-ascii?Q?QbiJW79o1yoM06Vj0axyP/AgNjONDjwKBRTsk/6Q8D2oLuE+EKmHpHi+v1wO?= =?us-ascii?Q?jA=3D=3D?= X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-ExternalHop-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-ExternalHop-MessageData-0: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b99af156-af8c-47ef-fd06-08ddd37673ef X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM4PR10MB8218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2025 16:46:26.3060 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 3WnQ75LXWl4z+xzDJWJnJ1MNOkzu2IWwmraVc375L03wsYjg2ee72x/JKyewG8NWibhl/7hu6x9bNQfwowLOS0/TYQhZOu2bkitafo9+zuc= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CYYPR10MB7673 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-08-04_07,2025-08-04_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2505160000 definitions=main-2508040093 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Dk703cVP5Inc8Ufku8UeJHPdTMJa8Cra X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=HY4UTjE8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6890e3e9 cx=c_pps a=XiAAW1AwiKB2Y8Wsi+sD2Q==:117 a=XiAAW1AwiKB2Y8Wsi+sD2Q==:17 a=6eWqkTHjU83fiwn7nKZWdM+Sl24=:19 a=z/mQ4Ysz8XfWz/Q5cLBRGdckG28=:19 a=lCpzRmAYbLLaTzLvsPZ7Mbvzbb8=:19 a=wKuvFiaSGQ0qltdbU6+NXLB8nM8=:19 a=Ol13hO9ccFRV9qXi2t6ftBPywas=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2OwXVqhp2XgA:10 a=GoEa3M9JfhUA:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=JfrnYn6hAAAA:8 a=hD80L64hAAAA:8 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=j6MPqDGJ52AK_ATnTbkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=1CNFftbPRP8L7MoqJWF3:22 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwODA0MDA5NCBTYWx0ZWRfXxr6IivuYVAUv MVqmt4RRSHuxcZNMDRx8rkEIQduZdRelmASQc9B5c/18BwQ2NCNnL/QioE2Mj1Nn8AOEiKdHlu1 PdsawwLSmwO19uZZLbsX6iv4jGe9hzMKTDdvzlhhCgjadKc+H6WOT75iXdvVD4piqpLJKlAgdEG rabXP4vdRyaLwFG3CCEC8OebMfLCgnxOKECRpCeMgOJt06sWX6vrn629jlSqf91Ega+j87WKZS4 nWTZXL9Ydr+eJNP7pcPBt+v737ERN2v5J/CXUga71lumtH93HjlnIFGyCL+2HrZSQJzh0oIOSa+ M28l4d+4VMVrDwqpZX451C/c/RPh7rqpIolGvXc7kk0M3T01PJ4iE2DODI1Q1pcbtet9haH+DNB RLR9QHdGokd7bba0uReWwNs0P8ef1pxeHr1JWvgfSUtA+xWPJbtzLrXFGcLzrqyMlU3fpPW5 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Dk703cVP5Inc8Ufku8UeJHPdTMJa8Cra X-Stat-Signature: c68qpws3eeqw5et4z5jexg5r1uzjbc4b X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A63CC100003 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1754326016-342370 X-HE-Meta: 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 KTcmyKmN 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > From: Pankaj Raghav > > There are many places in the kernel where we need to zeroout larger > chunks but the maximum segment we can zeroout at a time by ZERO_PAGE > is limited by PAGE_SIZE. > > This is especially annoying in block devices and filesystems where we > attach multiple ZERO_PAGEs to the bio in different bvecs. With multipage > bvec support in block layer, it is much more efficient to send out > larger zero pages as a part of single bvec. > > This concern was raised during the review of adding LBS support to > XFS[1][2]. > > Usually huge_zero_folio is allocated on demand, and it will be > deallocated by the shrinker if there are no users of it left. At moment, > huge_zero_folio infrastructure refcount is tied to the process lifetime > that created it. This might not work for bio layer as the completions > can be async and the process that created the huge_zero_folio might no > longer be alive. And, one of the main point that came during discussion > is to have something bigger than zero page as a drop-in replacement. > > Add a config option STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO that will result in allocating > the huge zero folio on first request, if not already allocated, and turn > it static such that it can never get freed. This makes using the > huge_zero_folio without having to pass any mm struct and does not tie the > lifetime of the zero folio to anything, making it a drop-in replacement > for ZERO_PAGE. > > If STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO config option is enabled, then > mm_get_huge_zero_folio() will simply return this page instead of > dynamically allocating a new PMD page. > > This option can waste memory in small systems or systems with 64k base > page size. So make it an opt-in and also add an option from individual > architecture so that we don't enable this feature for larger base page > size systems. Only x86 is enabled as a part of this series. Other > architectures shall be enabled as a follow-up to this series. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20231027051847.GA7885@lst.de/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/ZitIK5OnR7ZNY0IG@infradead.org/ > > Co-developed-by: David Hildenbrand > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++ > mm/Kconfig | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ > mm/huge_memory.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > index 0ce86e14ab5e..8e2aa1887309 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ config X86 > select ARCH_WANT_OPTIMIZE_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP if X86_64 > select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_PREINIT if X86_64 > select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP if X86_64 > + select ARCH_WANTS_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO if X86_64 > select ARCH_HAS_PARANOID_L1D_FLUSH > select ARCH_WANT_IRQS_OFF_ACTIVATE_MM > select BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h > index 7748489fde1b..78ebceb61d0e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h > @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf); > > extern struct folio *huge_zero_folio; > extern unsigned long huge_zero_pfn; > +extern atomic_t huge_zero_folio_is_static; Really don't love having globals like this, please can we have a helper function that tells you this and not extern it? Also we're not checking CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO but still exposing this value which a helper function would avoid also. > > static inline bool is_huge_zero_folio(const struct folio *folio) > { > @@ -494,6 +495,18 @@ static inline bool is_huge_zero_pmd(pmd_t pmd) > > struct folio *mm_get_huge_zero_folio(struct mm_struct *mm); > void mm_put_huge_zero_folio(struct mm_struct *mm); > +struct folio *__get_static_huge_zero_folio(void); Why are we declaring a static inline function prototype that we then implement immediately below? > + > +static inline struct folio *get_static_huge_zero_folio(void) > +{ > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO)) > + return NULL; > + > + if (likely(atomic_read(&huge_zero_folio_is_static))) > + return huge_zero_folio; > + > + return __get_static_huge_zero_folio(); > +} > > static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void) > { > @@ -685,6 +698,11 @@ static inline int change_huge_pud(struct mmu_gather *tlb, > { > return 0; > } > + > +static inline struct folio *get_static_huge_zero_folio(void) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */ > > static inline int split_folio_to_list_to_order(struct folio *folio, > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig > index e443fe8cd6cf..366a6d2d771e 100644 > --- a/mm/Kconfig > +++ b/mm/Kconfig > @@ -823,6 +823,27 @@ config ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB > config ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP > def_bool n > > +config ARCH_WANTS_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO > + def_bool n > + > +config STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO > + bool "Allocate a PMD sized folio for zeroing" > + depends on ARCH_WANTS_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO && TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > + help > + Without this config enabled, the huge zero folio is allocated on > + demand and freed under memory pressure once no longer in use. > + To detect remaining users reliably, references to the huge zero folio > + must be tracked precisely, so it is commonly only available for mapping > + it into user page tables. > + > + With this config enabled, the huge zero folio can also be used > + for other purposes that do not implement precise reference counting: > + it is still allocated on demand, but never freed, allowing for more > + wide-spread use, for example, when performing I/O similar to the > + traditional shared zeropage. > + > + Not suitable for memory constrained systems. > + > config MM_ID > def_bool n > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index ff06dee213eb..e117b280b38d 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, > static bool split_underused_thp = true; > > static atomic_t huge_zero_refcount; > +atomic_t huge_zero_folio_is_static __read_mostly; > struct folio *huge_zero_folio __read_mostly; > unsigned long huge_zero_pfn __read_mostly = ~0UL; > unsigned long huge_anon_orders_always __read_mostly; > @@ -266,6 +267,45 @@ void mm_put_huge_zero_folio(struct mm_struct *mm) > put_huge_zero_folio(); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO > + Extremely tiny silly nit - there's a blank line below this, but not under the #endif, let's remove this line. > +struct folio *__get_static_huge_zero_folio(void) > +{ > + static unsigned long fail_count_clear_timer; > + static atomic_t huge_zero_static_fail_count __read_mostly; > + > + if (unlikely(!slab_is_available())) > + return NULL; > + > + /* > + * If we failed to allocate a huge zero folio, just refrain from > + * trying for one minute before retrying to get a reference again. > + */ > + if (atomic_read(&huge_zero_static_fail_count) > 1) { > + if (time_before(jiffies, fail_count_clear_timer)) > + return NULL; > + atomic_set(&huge_zero_static_fail_count, 0); > + } Yeah I really don't like this. This seems overly complicated and too fiddly. Also if I want a static PMD, do I want to wait a minute for next attempt? Also doing things this way we might end up: 0. Enabling CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO 1. Not doing anything that needs a static PMD for a while + get fragmentation. 2. Do something that needs it - oops can't get order-9 page, and waiting 60 seconds between attempts 3. This is silent so you think you have it switched on but are actually getting bad performance. I appreciate wanting to reuse this code, but we need to find a way to do this really really early, and get rid of this arbitrary time out. It's very aribtrary and we have no easy way of tracing how this might behave under workload. Also we end up pinning an order-9 page either way, so no harm in getting it first thing? > + /* > + * Our raised reference will prevent the shrinker from ever having > + * success. > + */ > + if (!get_huge_zero_folio()) { > + int count = atomic_inc_return(&huge_zero_static_fail_count); > + > + if (count > 1) > + fail_count_clear_timer = get_jiffies_64() + 60 * HZ; > + > + return NULL; > + } > + > + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&huge_zero_folio_is_static, 0, 1) != 0) > + put_huge_zero_folio(); > + > + return huge_zero_folio; > +} > +#endif /* CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO */ > + > static unsigned long shrink_huge_zero_folio_count(struct shrinker *shrink, > struct shrink_control *sc) > { > @@ -277,7 +317,11 @@ static unsigned long shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, > struct shrink_control *sc) > { > if (atomic_cmpxchg(&huge_zero_refcount, 1, 0) == 1) { > - struct folio *zero_folio = xchg(&huge_zero_folio, NULL); > + struct folio *zero_folio; > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&huge_zero_folio_is_static))) > + return 0; I don't hugely love these various sets of static variables, I wonder if we could put them into a helper struct or something, and put these checks into helper functions? static bool have_static_huge_zero_folio(void) { return ...; } etc. ? > + zero_folio = xchg(&huge_zero_folio, NULL); > BUG_ON(zero_folio == NULL); > WRITE_ONCE(huge_zero_pfn, ~0UL); > folio_put(zero_folio); > -- > 2.49.0 > Cheers, Lorenzo