From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:55:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4444ceef-14c7-0975-673f-6fdeefdc4dc0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417150151.17239-1-david@redhat.com>
On 17.04.20 17:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Looking into why we still create memblocks for hotplugged memory (via
> add_memory()), I discovered that we might not need ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK on
> s390x after all.
>
> After [1] we will no longer create memblocks for hotplugged memory in
> case of !CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. With this series, the same will apply
> to standby memory on s390x, added via add_memory().
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416104707.20219-1-david@redhat.com
>
> David Hildenbrand (2):
> s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks
> s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> drivers/s390/char/zcore.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
Ping.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-17 15:01 David Hildenbrand
2020-04-17 15:01 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks David Hildenbrand
2020-06-10 11:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-06-19 12:47 ` Philipp Rudo
2020-06-19 12:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-17 15:01 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK David Hildenbrand
2020-06-26 16:32 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-06-29 12:44 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-06-29 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-29 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4444ceef-14c7-0975-673f-6fdeefdc4dc0@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kirr@nexedi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prudo@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox