linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"vishal.moola@gmail.com" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
	"wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	"minchan@kernel.org" <minchan@kernel.org>,
	"yuzhao@google.com" <yuzhao@google.com>,
	"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
	"ryan.roberts@arm.com" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	"shy828301@gmail.com" <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] madvise:madvise_free_pte_range(): don't use mapcount() against large folio for sharing check
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:04:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4412ad3c-ebed-40a4-8f4e-83bb1b53b686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <svdxtqiihsjwcbxjp67s6cteprhoxgypf7rjrk2v73ppyn2ogp@ee4ru6vgspl4>



On 8/16/2023 7:44 PM, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:30:35AM +0800, Yin Fengwei wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/15/23 21:25, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>>> Hi Yin,
>>> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:09:17AM +0800, Yin Fengwei wrote:
>>>> Commit 98b211d6415f ("madvise: convert madvise_free_pte_range() to use a
>>>> folio") replaced the page_mapcount() with folio_mapcount() to check
>>>> whether the folio is shared by other mapping.
>>>>
>>>> It's not correct for large folios. folio_mapcount() returns the total
>>>> mapcount of large folio which is not suitable to detect whether the folio
>>>> is shared.
>>>>
>>>> Use folio_estimated_sharers() which returns a estimated number of shares.
>>>> That means it's not 100% correct. It should be OK for madvise case here.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand why it should be ok for madvise this change, so
>>> I hope it's okay to ask you few questions.
>>>
>>> folio_mapcount() calculates the total maps for all the subpages of a
>>> folio. However, the folio_estimated_sharers does it only for the first
>>> subpage making it not true for large folios. Then, wouldn't this change
>>> drop support for large folios?
>> I saw David explained this very well in another mail.
>>
>>>
>>> Seems like folio_entire_mapcount() is not accurate either because of it
>>> does not inclue PTE-mapped sub-pages which I think we need here. Hence,
>>> the folio_mapcount(). Could this be something missing in the test side?
>>>
>>> I tried to replicate the setup with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE but
>>> seems like I'm not able to do it:
>>>
>>> ./cow
>>> # [INFO] detected THP size: 2048 KiB
>>> # [INFO] detected hugetlb size: 2048 KiB
>>> # [INFO] detected hugetlb size: 1048576 KiB
>>> # [INFO] huge zeropage is enabled
>>> TAP version 13
>>> 1..166
>>> # [INFO] Anonymous memory tests in private mappings
>>> # [RUN] Basic COW after fork() ... with base page
>>> not ok 1 MADV_NOHUGEPAGE failed
>>> # [RUN] Basic COW after fork() ... with swapped out base page
>>> not ok 2 MADV_NOHUGEPAGE failed
>>> # [RUN] Basic COW after fork() ... with THP
>>> not ok 3 MADV_HUGEPAGE failed
>>> # [RUN] Basic COW after fork() ... with swapped-out THP
>>> not ok 4 MADV_HUGEPAGE failed
>>> # [RUN] Basic COW after fork() ... with PTE-mapped THP
>>> not ok 5 MADV_HUGEPAGE failed
>>> # [RUN] Basic COW after fork() ... with swapped-out, PTE-mapped THP
>>> not ok 6 MADV_HUGEPAGE failed
>>> ...
>> Can you post the MADV_PAGEOUT and PTE-mapped THP related testing result?
>> And I suppose swap need be enabled also for the testing.
> 
> You may find a dump of the logs in the link below with system information. Let me
> know if you find something wrong in my setup or if you need something else.
> Besides CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, CONFIG_SWAP is also enabled in the kernel.
> 
> https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2584135
> 
> Also, strace reports ENOSYS for MADV_*:
> madvise(0x7f2912465000, 4096, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
> madvise(0x7f2912000000, 2097152, MADV_HUGEPAGE) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
O. The problem here is MADV_HUGEPAGE/MADV_NOHUGEPAGE doesn't work.
Do you have CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS enabled?


Regards
Yin, Fengwei

> 
> 
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Yin, Fengwei
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> User-visible effects is that the THP is skipped when user call madvise.
>>>> But the correct behavior is THP should be split and processed then.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: this change is a temporary fix to reduce the user-visible effects
>>>> before the long term fix from David is ready.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 98b211d6415f ("madvise: convert madvise_free_pte_range() to use a folio")
>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>>>> index 49af35e2d99a..4dded5d27e7e 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>>>> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>>>>  		if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>>>  			int err;
>>>>
>>>> -			if (folio_mapcount(folio) != 1)
>>>> +			if (folio_estimated_sharers(folio) != 1)
>>>>  				break;
>>>>  			if (!folio_trylock(folio))
>>>>  				break;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.39.2
>>> >


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-16 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-08  2:09 [PATCH v2 0/3] don't use mapcount() to check large folio sharing Yin Fengwei
2023-08-08  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] madvise:madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(): don't use mapcount() against large folio for sharing check Yin Fengwei
2023-08-08  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] madvise:madvise_free_huge_pmd(): " Yin Fengwei
2023-08-08  2:49   ` Yu Zhao
2023-08-08  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] madvise:madvise_free_pte_range(): " Yin Fengwei
     [not found]   ` <CGME20230815132509eucas1p1b34b2852a9c4efe743c8da82867c4cc3@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-08-15 13:25     ` Daniel Gomez
2023-08-15 13:41       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-15 23:30       ` Yin Fengwei
2023-08-16 11:44         ` Daniel Gomez
2023-08-16 12:04           ` Yin, Fengwei [this message]
2023-08-16 14:13             ` Daniel Gomez
2023-08-16 15:11               ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17  7:57                 ` Daniel Gomez
2023-08-08  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] don't use mapcount() to check large folio sharing Yu Zhao
2023-08-08  4:10   ` Yin, Fengwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4412ad3c-ebed-40a4-8f4e-83bb1b53b686@intel.com \
    --to=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox