From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: js1304@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm/page_ext: support extra space allocation by page_ext user
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43c12773-6ee6-b7c3-6357-67180e5bfd9b@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470809784-11516-5-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
On 08/10/2016 08:16 AM, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Until now, if some page_ext users want to use it's own field on page_ext,
> it should be defined in struct page_ext by hard-coding. It has a problem
> that wastes memory in following situation.
>
> struct page_ext {
> #ifdef CONFIG_A
> int a;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_B
> int b;
> #endif
> };
>
> Assume that kernel is built with both CONFIG_A and CONFIG_B.
> Even if we enable feature A and doesn't enable feature B at runtime,
> each entry of struct page_ext takes two int rather than one int.
> It's undesirable result so this patch tries to fix it.
>
> To solve above problem, this patch implements to support extra space
> allocation at runtime. When need() callback returns true, it's extra
> memory requirement is summed to entry size of page_ext. Also, offset
> for each user's extra memory space is returned. With this offset,
> user can use this extra space and there is no need to define needed
> field on page_ext by hard-coding.
>
> This patch only implements an infrastructure. Following patch will use it
> for page_owner which is only user having it's own fields on page_ext.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Fine, but...
>
> static void __init invoke_init_callbacks(void)
> @@ -91,6 +102,16 @@ static void __init invoke_init_callbacks(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static unsigned long get_entry_size(void)
> +{
> + return sizeof(struct page_ext) + extra_mem;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct page_ext *get_entry_base(void *base, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + return base + get_entry_size() * offset;
> +}
Why _base()? Why not just get_entry?
Also I find it confusing that the word offset here is different than the
offset in page_ext_operations. Maybe use "index" instead?
Vlastimil
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 6:16 [PATCH 0/5] Reduce memory waste by page extension user js1304
2016-08-10 6:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/debug_pagealloc: clean-up guard page handling code js1304
2016-08-10 8:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-11 9:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-12 12:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-16 2:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-11 9:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-10 6:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/debug_pagealloc: don't allocate page_ext if we don't use guard page js1304
2016-08-10 9:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-11 9:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-10 6:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/page_owner: move page_owner specific function to page_owner.c js1304
2016-08-10 8:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-11 12:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-10 6:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/page_ext: support extra space allocation by page_ext user js1304
2016-08-11 12:53 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-08-10 6:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/page_owner: don't define fields on struct page_ext by hard-coding js1304
2016-08-11 13:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43c12773-6ee6-b7c3-6357-67180e5bfd9b@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox