linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Huan Yang <link@vivo.com>
Cc: bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Vivek Kasireddy" <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	opensource.kernel@vivo.com
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP is broken, was Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Deep talk about folio vmap
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 18:07:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DD699A-5C5D-429B-A2B5-61FBEAE2E252@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9A899641-BDED-4773-B349-56AF1DD58B21@linux.dev>



> On Apr 4, 2025, at 17:38, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 4, 2025, at 17:01, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>> 
>> After the btrfs compressed bio discussion I think the hugetlb changes that
>> skip the tail pages are fundamentally unsafe in the current kernel.
>> 
>> That is because the bio_vec representation assumes tail pages do exist, so
>> as soon as you are doing direct I/O that generates a bvec starting beyond
>> the present head page things will blow up.  Other users of bio_vecs might
>> do the same, but the way the block bio_vecs are generated are very suspect
>> to that.  So we'll first need to sort that out and a few other things
>> before we can even think of enabling such a feature.
>> 
> 
> I would like to express my gratitude to Christoph for including me in the
> thread. I have carefully read the cover letter in [1], which indicates
> that an issue has arisen due to the improper use of `vmap_pfn()`. I'm
> wondering if we could consider using `vmap()` instead. In the HVO scenario,
> the tail struct pages do **exist**, but they are read-only. I've examined
> the code of `vmap()`, and it appears that it only reads the struct page.
> Therefore, it seems feasible for us to use `vmap()` (I am not a expert in
> udmabuf.). Right?

I believe my stance is correct. I've also reviewed another thread in [2].
Allow me to clarify and correct the viewpoints you presented. You stated:
  "
   So by HVO, it also not backed by pages, only contains folio head, each
   tail pfn's page struct go away.
  "
This statement is entirely inaccurate. The tail pages do not cease to exist;
rather, they are read-only. For your specific use-case, please use `vmap()`
to resolve the issue at hand. If you wish to gain a comprehensive understanding
of the fundamentals of HVO, I kindly suggest a thorough review of the document
in [3].

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5229b24f-1984-4225-ae03-8b952de56e3b@vivo.com/#t
[3] Documentation/mm/vmemmap_dedup.rst

> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250327092922.536-1-link@vivo.com/T/#m055b34978cf882fd44d2d08d929b50292d8502b4
> 
> Thanks,
> Muchun.
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-27  9:28 Huan Yang
2025-03-27  9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] udmabuf: try fix udmabuf vmap Huan Yang
2025-03-27  9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] udmabuf: try udmabuf vmap test Huan Yang
2025-03-27  9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/vmalloc: try add vmap folios range Huan Yang
2025-03-27  9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] udmabuf: use vmap_range_folios Huan Yang
2025-03-27  9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] udmabuf: vmap test suit for pages and pfns compare Huan Yang
2025-03-27  9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] udmabuf: remove no need code Huan Yang
2025-03-28 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Deep talk about folio vmap Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-04-04  9:01 ` CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP is broken, was " Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-04  9:38   ` Muchun Song
2025-04-04 10:07     ` Muchun Song [this message]
2025-04-07  1:59       ` Huan Yang
2025-04-07  2:57         ` Muchun Song
2025-04-07  3:21           ` Huan Yang
2025-04-07  3:37             ` Muchun Song
2025-04-07  6:43               ` Muchun Song
2025-04-07  7:09                 ` Huan Yang
2025-04-07  7:22                   ` Muchun Song
2025-04-07  8:55                     ` Huan Yang
2025-04-07  8:59                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07  9:48                   ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43DD699A-5C5D-429B-A2B5-61FBEAE2E252@linux.dev \
    --to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=link@vivo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=opensource.kernel@vivo.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox