linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Joe Seigh <jseigh_02@xemaps.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] lockless radix tree readside
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 09:36:20 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43961264.5060006@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dn4c20$e7m$1@sea.gmane.org>

Joe Seigh wrote:

> Well, I don't have a kernel development set up so I can't comment on
> the specific patch but I have done some minor experimentation with reader
> lock-free b-trees, specifically insert, delete, and rotate (no actual
> balancing heuristics though) so I can comment on what some of the 
> general issues are.
> 
> You need to have a serialization point in your tree modifications so
> the change becomes atomically visible to threads reading the tree.

Yes, that is the memory barrier in rcu_assign_pointer.

> This is important for the semantics of your data structure.  It's not
> good to have a node become temporarily invisible to readers if the
> tree operation involved moving a node or subtree around with more than
> a single link modification.  So you will likely find yourself needing to 
> use
> COW (copy on write) or PCOW (partial copy on write), particularly on
> deletes of non leaf nodes. PCOW is naturally better, especially if you
> can minimize the number of nodes that have to be copied.
> 

Fortunately the radix tree never needs to do anything like this.
It doesn't move nodes or subtrees - the only modification operations
needed are to insert and delete items (ignoring the tag operations,
which are done under lock).

> So that's probably what you want to have in your documentation; what
> the serialization points are, your COW or PCOW mechanism, and how
> they preserve semantics.
> 
> Also I assume you're returning lookups by value and not reference
> unless they're refcounted (which naturally since you're using RCU
> can be incremented safely if the refcount is not zero)
> 

It can return either. It is up to the reader to do the right thing
in either case (which will need a note in the API comments).

Thanks,
Nick

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2005-12-06 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-06  1:40 Nick Piggin
2005-12-06  3:11 ` David S. Miller, Nick Piggin
2005-12-06  5:48   ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-06 15:53 ` Joe Seigh
2005-12-06 22:36   ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43961264.5060006@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=jseigh_02@xemaps.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox