From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f198.google.com (mail-pf0-f198.google.com [209.85.192.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ED66B0005 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f198.google.com with SMTP id h186so68919772pfg.3 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:56:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s6si116429pay.219.2016.07.19.17.56.53 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] Provide the interface to validate the proc_id which they give References: <1468913288-16605-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1468913288-16605-8-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160719185320.GN3078@mtj.duckdns.org> From: Dou Liyang Message-ID: <438ce500-ec84-9f55-0422-d033a1f4590f@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:55:11 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160719185320.GN3078@mtj.duckdns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: cl@linux.com, mika.j.penttila@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, hpa@zytor.com, yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, gongzhaogang@inspur.com, len.brown@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, chen.tang@easystack.cn, rafael@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org a?? 2016a1'07ae??20ae?JPY 02:53, Tejun Heo a??e??: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:28:08PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote: >> When we want to identify whether the proc_id is unreasonable or not, we >> can call the "acpi_processor_validate_proc_id" function. It will search >> in the duplicate IDs. If we find the proc_id in the IDs, we return true >> to the call function. Conversely, false represents available. >> >> When we establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping, we will use the >> proc_id from ACPI table. >> >> We do validation when we get the proc_id. If the result is true, we will >> stop the mapping. > The patch title probably should include "acpi:" header. I can't tell > much about the specifics of the acpi changes but I think this is the > right approach for handling cpu hotplugs. I will change the title in the next version. Thanks. > Thanks. > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org