linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, clameter@engr.sgi.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	steiner@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Free pages from local pcp lists under tight memory conditions
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 11:32:27 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <438F961B.6060709@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051201064446.c87049ad.pj@sgi.com>

Paul Jackson wrote:
> Rohit wrote:
> 
>>Can you please comment on the performance delta on the MPI workload
>>because of this change in batch values. 
> 
> 
> I can't -- all I know is what I read in Jack Steiner's posts
> of April 5, 2005, referenced earlier in this thread.
> 

It was something fairly large. Basically having a power of 2 batch size
meant that 2 concurrent allocators (presumably setting up the working
area) would alternately pull in power of 2 chunks of memory, which
caused each CPU to only get pages of ~half of its cache's possible
colours.

The fix is not by any means a single value for all workloads, it simply
avoids powers of 2 batch size. Note this will have very little effect
on single threaded allocators and will do nothing for cache colouring
there, however it is important for concurrent allocators.

Nick

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-02  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-23  0:10 Rohit Seth
2005-11-23  5:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23  5:58   ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 18:17     ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-23  6:36   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-11-23  6:42   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-11-23 16:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-23 17:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-11-23 17:54   ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-23 18:06     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-23 19:41       ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-24  9:25         ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-23 23:26       ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-23 19:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-11-23 19:46   ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-23 19:55     ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 21:00       ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-23 21:25         ` Christoph Lameter
2005-11-23 22:29           ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-23 21:26         ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 21:40           ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-24  3:02         ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-29 23:18           ` Rohit Seth
2005-12-01 14:44             ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-02  0:32               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-11-23 22:01       ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=438F961B.6060709@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox