From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Adrian Huang <adrianhuang0701@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.79.tang@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: Correct misleading comment on mmap_lock field in mm_struct
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:30:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437e07b4-e973-4600-897c-96f67f8ec8a4@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805084726.2054-1-ahuang12@lenovo.com>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 04:47:26PM +0800, Adrian Huang wrote:
> From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
>
> The comment previously described the offset of mmap_lock as 0x120 (hex),
> which is misleading. The correct value is 120 (decimal), and using '0x120'
> could confuse readers trying to understand why the count and owner fields
> reside in separate cachelines.
This isn't the case on my system, pahole puts it at 184, if you subtract the
first field + cache line padding at the start of the structure, then 120 from
there... I guess?
I think it'd be better to say 'offset 56 bytes past the start of the cache
line' rather than to give specific values.
E.g.:
/*
* Typically the current mmap_lock's offset is 56 bytes from the last cache
line boundary, which is very optimal... etc. etc.
...
*/
>
> This change also removes an unnecessary space for improved formatting.
>
> Fixes: 2e3025434a6b ("mm: relocate 'write_protect_seq' in struct mm_struct")
There's no need for fixes for a comment change.
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Thanks! You're sending from a gmail account though, please make the email you
send from and signed off the same, or otherwise we don't know whether this is
the real you :)
> ---
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 1ec273b06691..ec90bbf22e2b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -1027,9 +1027,9 @@ struct mm_struct {
> */
> /*
> * With some kernel config, the current mmap_lock's offset
> - * inside 'mm_struct' is at 0x120, which is very optimal, as
> + * inside 'mm_struct' is at 120, which is very optimal, as
> * its two hot fields 'count' and 'owner' sit in 2 different
> - * cachelines, and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
> + * cachelines, and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
> * of the 2 fields will be accessed frequently, current layout
> * will help to reduce cache bouncing.
> *
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Cheers, Lorenzo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 8:47 Adrian Huang
2025-08-05 9:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-05 9:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437e07b4-e973-4600-897c-96f67f8ec8a4@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=adrianhuang0701@gmail.com \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.79.tang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox